AEG-Telefunken v Commission Case [1983] ECR. 3151
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:12:44 UTC
AEG operates system of distribution throughout the EU, to be part of it, needed to accept charging the high prices.
One company didn't and complained this was concerted practice.
AEG thought would win easy because unilateral behavior
Held
The tacit agreement of all other distributors made it a concerted practice. .
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Volkswagen AG v Commission
After distribution agreements had been signed, Commission found that manufacturer had sent circulars to all distributors with intention to influence the discount policy. But no evidence that distribu...
Ford-Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc. v Commission
Ford made cars and had distribution system. In UK charged higher prices. A company then imported Ford cars from Germany to UK. Ford then told German makers to stop selling right handed cars, and the...
Consten v Grundig
1957 Grundig entered into contract with Consten, French undertaking meant to be sole representative of Grundig in France for sale of radios, TV, etc. This was a vertical agreement. UNEF bought Grundi...
Italian Flat Glass
Had three Italian companies that together held 90% Market share in Italian market of flat glass. Companies charged identical prices and maintained identical conditions of sale. Commission investigate...
C-379/98 Preussen Elektra
Energy suppliers were forced, by German law, to buy energy from renewable energy producers in Germany at a minimum price that was considerably higher than the cost of buying from non-renewable energy...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.