xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Law Cases
Land Law Cases
Constructive trusts, unjust enrichment, tracing 2010 Cases

Binions v Evans [1972] Ch 359

Country:
United Kingdom
By Oxbridge Law Team
Lord Denning MR

  • Defendant was allowed to have a lifelong rent-free lease by X but that the agreement could be determined with not less than 4 weeks notice. This was described in the contract as making Defendant a tenant at will.

  • X then sold the house in which Defendant lived to Plaintiff, “subject to” the lifelong lease, for which Plaintiff paid a reduced price. Plaintiff then tried to have Defendant evicted - gave notice and claimed, after her continued occupation beyond the 4 weeks, that she was trespassing.

  • CA denied Plaintiff’s claim, holding that Defendant was entitled to reside in the house until her death.

    • CA held that purchasers with notice take property as constructive trustees for their person subject to whose right the property is sold. 

    • It held that contractual descriptions were inconclusive and that Plaintiff undertook a constructive trust to allow Defendant’s residence there, due to the words “subject to”.  

Lord Denning MR

In these circumstances, this court will impose on the plaintiffs a constructive trust for her benefit: for the simple reason that it would be utterly inequitable for the plaintiffs to turn the defendant out contrary to the stipulation subject to which they took the premises.

  • A purchaser can take “subject to” the other party’s right either expressly (where the contract so provides) or impliedly. 

  • In either case a constructive trust can be imposed. 

  • NB other judges worked on the basis that Defendant was a tenant for life and therefore there was no need for a constructive trust.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch

Similar cases

Chandler v Kerley
X and Defendant bought a house, and after getting divorced sold it to Plaintiff, for substantially less than the asking price, with whom Defendant was in a relationship. Defendant and her children co...
Tanner v Tanner
Defendant and Plaintiff had children and agreed that a house should be purchased for Defendant and the children. Plaintiff paid for the house and Defendant left her rent-controlled flat to live there...
Banner Homes Group plc v Luff Developments Ltd
Plaintiff and Defendant agreed informally that neither would bid for a plot of land. Defendant then did so and Plaintiff claimed that Defendant held it on trust for both of them. CA allowed Plaintiff...
Strand Securities v Caswell
Defendant had a sub-lease for over 21 years and which ought to have been registered but was not, and therefore was void unless it was an overriding interest. He did not live there himself but let X l...
IRC v Lloyds Private Banking Ltd
Mr. and Mrs. E owned house as tenants in common. On her death Mrs. E left her half share on trust provided that: While my husband… remains alive and desires to reside in the property and keeps the sa...

Related free notes samples

Leases Notes
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all th

logo

Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.

©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.