xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Boustany v Pigott [1995] 69 P & CR 298

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Plaintiff leased a property to Defendant, whose affairs were managed by her brother, X, since she was “quite slow”.

  • When X was away, Plaintiff got a lawyer to draw up a new lease at a much higher rent and although the lawyer warned Defendant that it would not be in her interest to sign, she insisted on doing so.

  • Defendant wanted to set aside the new lease as an unconscionable bargain and PC allowed this. 

Lord Templeman

  • There are several points regarding when and how equitable fraud can vitiate a contract:

    1. For equity to be invoked the agreement must be unconscionable in that “one of the parties to it has imposed the objectionable terms in a morally reprehensible manner”;

    2. “Unconscionable” relates to to the terms of the bargain AND to the moral culpability of the stronger party;

    3. There has to be both unequal bargaining power and an abuse of that power;

    4. There has to actually be unconscionable conduct  and it isn’t enough that the terms are unfair or imbalanced;

    5. The burden is on the party seeking relief to show unconscionable conduct, “namely that unconscientious advantage has been taken of his disabling condition or circumstances”.

      • Mckendrick: It is odd that the bargain was set aside despite Plaintiff getting good legal advice not to sign from the lawyer. 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch