C-408/95 Eurotunnel SA v Seafrance [1997] ECR I-6315
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-07 04:50:20 UTC
The ECJ held that a challenge under Article 234 was possible regarding provisions of a directive addressed to member states if it was unclear that the applicants would have been granted standing under 230.
TWD case was distinguished because there it was obvious that the plaintiff would have had standing to bring an annulment claim under 230.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
C-188/92 TWD Textilwerke
Commission decided that aid given by German government to a company was incompatible with free market, and the aid therefore had to be paid. The decision was addressed to German government, who told...
R v Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco
A directive had been challenged in the UK before it had been implemented by Plaintiff seeking JR, in national courts, of the decision to implement, on the basis that the directive was invalid. The ke...
Plaumann & Co v Commission
In 1961 the German Government requested Community to authorize it to suspend the collection of duties on clementines imported from non-member countries. Community refused the request & addressed its...
41/74 Van Duyn
Article 48 EEC was self-executing, directly impacted the legal orders of member states, and conferred individual rights enforceable by national courts. A member state's exercise of rights under Artic...
Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council
See notes in Gormley article (below). An association of farmers (UPA) sought the annulment of Regulation 1638/98, which amended the common organisation of the olive oil market. CFI dismissed the appl...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.