xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Campbell v MGN (HL) [2004] UKHL 22

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Claimant, Naomi Campbell, was photographed leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting in London. She had previously claimed she was not a drug addict.

  • Mirror published the story; key things published:

    1. Fact Claimant was drug addict

    2. Fact she attended Narcotics Anonymous meeting

    3. Details of how long and often she attended

    4. Photos of her leaving the meeting

  • Claimant sued for breach of confidence.

Held

  • Test for breach of confidence is whether Claimant had reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of disclosed information.

  • Thus no pre-existing relationship of confidence required 

    • I.e. obligation of confidence arises where Claimant knows or ought to know there is reasonable expectation information will be kept confidential

  • People are encouraged to attend NA meetings because of their private nature. 

  • Therefore Claimant obviously has reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to meetings. 

Conclusion

  • Defendant was entitled to publish fact that Claimant was drug addict and receiving treatment from NA.

    • Necessary to correct false impression

  • However Claimant not entitled to publish details of her attendance nor photos of Claimant at same time

    • Were not necessary in public interest or to add to credibility of story

    • Were intrusive

      • Had been taken covertly

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch