2xl

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Case C-372/04 ex parte Watts [2006] ECR I-4325

Country:

United Kingdom

By Oxbridge Law Team

Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team

Updated 2024-01-04 07:15:01 UTC

ECJ

Watts needed a hip replacement and the NHS didn’t give her one for a year, so she went to France and got the treatment after her condition deteriorated.
She asked the NHS to reimburse her costs, but it refused on the grounds that she had failed to obtain prior authorisation.
ECJ held that the rule on prior authorisation infringed the Article 49 freedom to provide services and that the NHS would have to compensate an individual who went overseas after a medically unacceptable delay.

ECJ

Watts paid for the services she received and the fact that she sought reimbursement does not mean that it ceases to become a service or that Article 49 no longer applies.

----

Free movement and fundamental rights: how we seek to reconcile differently motivated fundamental – but not absolute – rights.

Any comments or edits about this case?

Get in touch

About Oxbridge

Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.

We offer free case summaries, sample notes, and award-winning content, all curated and approved by our editorial team. Our reputation for excellence has led to features in The Guardian, Wikipedia, and the National Council for Law Reporting (Kenya Law).

Every year, millions of students utilize our free and premium notes to aid their studies.