Constable v Executive Connections [2005] 2 BCLC 638
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:05:08 UTC
A change was being made to articles of a company; Claimant sought to challenge it.
Defendant sought to have application struck out on grounds that there was no case to answer.
Held
Law in this area is “somewhat untidy”
-
Thus strike-out application refused.
As so many earlier cases contradicted one another that it was impossible to say for certain what law in relevant area was.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
British Equitable v Baily
Claimant took out insurance policy with Defendant, a company. Articles were later changed, and Claimant sued for declaration that this did not affect his rights under policy. As matter of constructio...
Southern Foundries v Shirlaw
Claimant, a director, had a ten-year service contract with Defendant, company. Power was inserted into articles allowing shareholders to appoint and dismiss directors at will. Claimant was dismissed...
R v Social Security Secretary, ex parte Child Poverty Action Group
Plaintiff was a pressure group appealing the benefits decision of Defendant based on the fact that questions should have been referred to a more senior officer. CA held that there was standing, thoug...
Law v National Greyhound Racing Club
Defendant, a company, ran several greyhound racing stadiums and it decided to suspend Plaintiff’s trainer licence. Plaintiff sought a declaration that the decision was ultra vires and in breach of an...
London Sack & Bag
Claimant and Defendant were both members of a trade association company. Articles of association stated that ‘trade disputes’ should be submitted to arbitration. Dispute between two members arose as...
Related free notes samples
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.