xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Couturier v Hastie [1856] 5 HLC 672

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Plaintiff contracted to sell corn to Defendant but the corn deteriorated and was sold before the date of the sale and Defendant refused to pay.

  • Plaintiff sued for the money, claiming that Defendant had really bought the rights from the shipping documents so that any loss to the corn would be the risk of Defendant, not Plaintiff.

  • HL found for Defendant, saying that:

    1. The document was for the sale of the corn itself and

    2. The risk of mistake as to the existence of the document would go with the seller and

    3. The non-existence of the corn meant that there was no consideration.

Lord Cairns

  • Where there is nothing to be sold, Defendant cannot be compelled to pay for the thing that doesn’t exist.

    • Smith: This doesn’t say whether he means there is no contract or whether the contract does exist but that Plaintiff has not performed

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch