xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Davis v Powell [1978] 51 TC 492

Country:
United Kingdom
  • A tenant farmer’s tenancy was surrendered in consequence of a notice to quit served by the landlord. The landlord paid to the tenant £591 by way of compensation for disturbance under s 34(1) of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948.

  • The Crown contended that the £591 was a capital sum derived from an asset, viz the lease.

Lord Templeman

  • Compensation for disturbance paid under s34 was not 'derived' from an asset, but was simply a sum which, by statute, had to be paid for expense and loss unavoidably incurred once the tenancy had been terminated. 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch