Extrasure Travel Insurance [2003] 1 BCLC 598
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:05:41 UTC
Test for whether director is acting in best interests of company (old law) is subjective.
Fact that director was behaving unreasonably is simply evidence towards showing he was not in good faith
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Regentcrest v Cohen
Directors have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders, which includes the duty of loyalty, care, and avoiding conflicts of interest. A breach occurs when a...
Franbar Holdings Ltd v Patel
Relevant test under s. 263(3)(b) is that of a hypothetical director. i.e. if such a person would not attach very much importance to pursuing claim, no leave granted. Factors which hypothetical direct...
Hogg v Cramphorn
In corporate governance, directors are guided by fiduciary duties to prioritize the company's best interests. This involves strategic decisions like issuing shares and lending money to maintain contr...
Hopkins v TL Dallas Group
Director signed letters of undertaking on behalf of his company to pay £1 million to company B. He did so fraudulently for his own benefit. Company B attempted to get payment from director’s company....
Re City Equitable Fire Insurance
Where director properly delegates to someone else, is entitled to assume that person will perform duties properly This subjective view rejected in later cases
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.