xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Law Cases
European Law Cases
European integration, Constitutional limits on European lawmaking Cases

Germany v Parliament and Council [2000] ECR I-8419

Country:
United Kingdom
By Oxbridge Law Team
ECJ Judgement
RELATED CASES

  • Germany was challenging a directive issued pursuant to Article 95, which sought to ban tobacco advertising in all forms except at the point of sale.

  • Germany argued that the directive was unlawful, as those articles did not provide the legal basis for issuing a directive on tobacco advertising.

  • ECJ agreed, and annulled the directive. 

ECJ Judgement

  • Article 95 conferred on the council/commission the power to promote the internal free market, but did not imply a power to regulate the market. 

  • Measures adopted under Article 95 must have the specific objective of improving the conditions for the establishment and functioning of the internal market – and they must be designed to remove genuine obstacles to free movement rather than being concerned with purely abstract risks. 

  • It would be contrary to Article 5 to allow EP to assume a power not conferred on it. ECJ said that (settled case law) Article 95 may not be used to merely remove ‘incidental’, rather than ‘appreciable’ barriers to competition. 

  • No such appreciable distortions of competition were addressed by this directive.

  • Good - the power to remove internal obstacles to free trade of a product (tobacco advertising here) does not include the power to ban the product itself. It cannot be seriously claimed that this directive was intended to remove internal barriers/obstructions to free trade, as individual member states would be permitted to take even harsher steps under the directives. 

RELATED CASES

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch

Similar cases

Germany v Parliament and Council
Another, more restricted directive was passed to limit tobacco advertising (no TV / Radio adverts). ECJ held that this was within the scope of powers granted under art. 95. Said, while a mere finding...
Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
Another directive made under Article 95, addressed to Sweden, Austria and a couple of other countries, was created to limit tobacco advertising. The ECJ held that this directive was valid because it...
C-491/01 Ex Parte British American Tobacco
A directive on harmonised rules relating to the sale, presentation and manufacture of cigarettes were held to be a genuine promotion of the functioning free market. This was because the likelihood of...
Alliance for Natural Health
A directive had been passed that banned advertising of foods containing certain minerals/chemicals, made pursuant to Article 95. ECJ held that the directive was valid.  Said that failure to produce s...
C-239/02 Douwe Egberts NV v Westrom Pharma NV and Others
The ECJ was asked whether the Belgian law, which provides for an outright ban of any references to slimming on foodstuffs labelling, infringes EU law including the principles of the free movement of...

Related free notes samples

Competence Notes
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all t
Free Movement Of Goods Notes
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find
Legal Limits On European Law Mak...
European Human Rights law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge, UK. These not

logo

Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.

©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.