Greene v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2005] 1 All ER 30
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:03:48 UTC
This case established that when a judge is considering granting an interlocutory injunction he should only do so if it is more likely than not that Plaintiff will be able to prove defamation.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL
Plaintiffs company were defamed in a wider article by Defendant’s newspaper about companies under investigation for links to terrorism. HL said that the newspaper would be acquitted of defamation bec...
Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe
Plaintiffs company were defamed in a wider article by Defendant’s newspaper about companies under investigation for links to terrorism. HL said that the newspaper would be acquitted of defamation bec...
Newstead v London Express
Defendant reported the trial of bigamy of X, who had the same name and age as Plaintiff. Because of the lack of particularity in Defendant’s description of X, many people thought that Plaintiff was b...
Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
Defendant published articles in a newspaper and on its internet site claiming that Plaintiff was involved in criminal activities and Plaintiff sued Defendant for defamation. Defendant tried to run th...
Tolstoy v United Kingdom
Plaintiff was successfully sued for libel when he published a pamphlet claiming that X had been involved in bad treatment of Prisoners of War (POWs). He was restricted from publishing material with “...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.