xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Habib Bank v Habib Bank AG Zurich [1981] 1 WLR 1265

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Defendant was a bank incorporated in Switzerland, formed out of a former Pakistani bank of the same name.

  • Subsequent to this incorporation, Pakistani bank was nationalised. However Claimant, as a nationalised bank, continued trading extensively with Defendant.

  • Only 7 years after nationalisation did Claimant bring claim for passing off against Defendant.

Held

  • For acquiescence, failure of Claimant to sue Defendant must have encouraged Defendant to believe that the wrong was being assented to

  • Here, is hard to think of what more Claimant could have done to give such encouragement than continue trading with Defendant.

  • Thus defence of acquiescence applies.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch