Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland & Ors [2001] Ch 143
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:13:21 UTC
Defendant also claimed publication was in public interest.
Held
Publication of stills not in public interest
This because information could have been conveyed without breaching copyright.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Hyde Park Residence v Yelland
Sun published stills from security camera footage which showed Princess Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed arriving and leaving a Paris villa. Owner of villa brought action for breach of copyright. Defendant ar...
Douglas and Zeta-Jones v Hello
Plaintiffs agreed that O alone could publish photos of their wedding, refusing a bid from Defendant. Defendant nevertheless managed to gain access to some photos taken without permission and Plaintif...
Beloff v Pressdram Ltd
Claimant wrote an internal memorandum relating to a member of the government which was leaked to Private Eye, who then published it. Defendant sought to rely on defence of ‘fair dealing for the purpo...
Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
Defendant published articles in a newspaper and on its internet site claiming that Plaintiff was involved in criminal activities and Plaintiff sued Defendant for defamation. Defendant tried to run th...
Ashdown v Telegraph Group
Defendant also claimed that publication of memorandum was in public interest, and that this defence had to be interpreted in light of ECHR Article 10 (right to freedom of expression). Held: Definitio...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.