Defendant, ICE TV, created a electronic schedule of programmes to be broadcast on Australian TV each week.
Claimant alleged that this was an infringement of the copyright subsisting in its weekly TV guide.
Ladbroke v William Hill referred to unfavourably.
Purely informative material reproduced by D is not sufficiently original to have copyright.
Court distinguished between:
Provision of names and title information (which is unoriginal)
Selection of what programmes to put on when, and manner of presentation of that information (which is original)