xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

IRC v McGuckian [1997] BTC 346

Country:
United Kingdom

Lord Steyn

  • The new development was not based on a linguistic analysis of the meaning of particular words in a statute.

  • It was founded on a broad purposive interpretation, giving effect to the intention of Parliament… And in asserting the power to examine the substance of a composite transaction the HL was simply rejecting formalism in fiscal matters and choosing a more realistic legal analysis.

  • Highly questionable. The intention of Parliament is expressed in the statute…

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch