xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Jolley v Sutton LBC [2000] 1 WLR 1082

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Defendant knew of a boat beside a block of flats and made plans to remove it which were never implemented. Plaintiffs (children) played in it and the boat, which was rotten, collapsed causing them injuries.

  • HL allowed Plaintiffs’ claim.

    • The council had conceded that it had a duty to remove the boat, but claimed that only minor injuries were foreseeable from the rotten planking giving way.

    • HL held that since the means by which injury was reasonably foreseeable, an injury of a greater extent but of the same type (the type being injury from planking giving way) came within the scope of Defendant’s duty of care. 

Lord Steyn

  • He denies that the manner of the injury nor the extent of the injury had to be reasonably foreseeable.

  • Only the type of injury had to be reasonably foreseeable. 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch