Northside Developments v Registrar General [1990] 170 CLR 146
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:05:44 UTC
Three of the Five Judges
Indoor management rule only applies where X can be shown to have had actual or ostensible authority
Thus simply operates to save a transaction where X has entered it with ostensible authority, and where he lacked authority due to some defect of internal procedure.
NB this case was decided in Australia at a time when they did not have an equivalent to s.40.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Properties Ltd
X and Y had formed defendant company, for purpose of selling some land. X, Y and a nominee of both were appointed directors; under articles, all 4 were needed to constitute a quorum. X spent most of...
Bradley v Jockey Club
B had received money in return for sensitive information about horses which breached the Jockey Club’s rules and was therefore disqualified for 5 years from working in racing. CA said that while it h...
Law v National Greyhound Racing Club
Defendant, a company, ran several greyhound racing stadiums and it decided to suspend Plaintiff’s trainer licence. Plaintiff sought a declaration that the decision was ultra vires and in breach of an...
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd
Richards, a director and chairman of defendant company, was accustomed to entering into various contracts on Defendant’s behalf and only informing other directors subsequently. Claimant was managing...
McInnes v Onslow-Fane
The Plaintiff had been granted a boxing manager's licence for several years. He appealed its refusal now, since he had not been given a hearing or been given reasons for its refusal. Held: That since...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.