xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Law Cases
Criminal Law Cases
Duress Cases

R v Dudley and Stephens [1884] 14 QBD 273

Country:
United Kingdom
By Oxbridge Law Team
Lord Coleridge
RELATED CASES

  • Defendants were on a raft after shipwreck and having gone 7 days without food and 5 without water they decided to kill and eat Victim who was the weakest and looked like he would die soon anyway. Later they were rescued.

  • Defendants argued that since there was no prospect of rescue at the time of the killing (accepted by court) that there ought to be a defence of necessity.

  • HL upheld convictions for murder.

Lord Coleridge

  • Said that even though temptation in this case would be insurmountable, the law sometimes has to set up unrealistically high standards (presumably to assert the principle that each individual has a right not to be killed) and compassion for Defendant doesn’t change the legal definition.

  • Lord Coleridge said that sometimes one had a duty to sacrifice one’s own life and that one could obviously not be a fair judge of necessity when one has an interest:

    • I.e. Defendant was taking the decision about whether it was worth sacrificing another for his sake. 

RELATED CASES

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch

Similar cases

R v Quayle
Defendants either grew and used cannabis so as to alleviate severe pain/sleeplessness or gave it to others who said that they needed it to alleviate pain. They were all convicted, in some cases after...
Re A (children)
There were 2 conjoined twins, J and M. If they remained conjoined then both would die, while if they were separated only M would die. CA say doctors have a duty to preserve M’s life (i.e. not operate...
R v Matthews and Alleyne
Matthews (M), Alleyne (A) and two others threw a boy off a bridge into a river after he told them that he couldn’t swim. He drowned, and the judge directed that if the boy’s death was appreciated by...
R v Martin (Tony)
Victims broke onto Defendant’s home to rob it and, without warning, Defendant shot Victims, killing one of them. Self defence, CA said, did not apply since, even though Defendant was eccentric, he di...
R v Thabo Meli
Some men hit another man and believing him dead, left the body outside. The judge found as fact that the death had not come from the blow but from the exposure of being left outside. The defence said...

Related free notes samples

Homicide Notes
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all t

logo

Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.

©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.