R v H [2005] 2 All ER 859
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:03:23 UTC
Defendant asked Victim for sex and she ignored him. He grabbed her tracksuit bottoms and pulled Victim towards him.
CA upheld that this was sexual assault since whether “touching” was sexual depended on its nature and circumstance.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
R v Olugboja
This was a case where a man told a woman that he would have sex with her (this was after his friend, as he knew, had raped Defendant the same evening, and had now dragged Victim’s friend into the bed...
R v Heard
Defendant was drunk and rubbed his penis against Victim’s leg and was convicted of sexual assault. He appealed on the grounds that sexual assault should be considered a crime of specific intent. CA s...
R v Khan
Sexual offenses, including rape, hinge on the concept of consent—whether the act was agreed upon willingly or affirmatively. Attempted rape occurs when someone takes significant steps towards committ...
R v Kimber
Defendant indecently touched Victim, a patient in a mental hospital, without caring whether or not she consented. CA said that Defendant “couldn’t care less," i.e. didn’t even consider her feelings -...
R v Clarkson
Defendants watched X rape a woman and did nothing to stop him. However they did nothing to encourage the rape nor was there evidence to show that they intended to encourage the rape. They were convic...
Related free notes samples
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.