R v Registrar of Companies, ex parte Central Bank of India [1986] QB 1114
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:01:01 UTC
This was a dispute about the Registrar of Companies agreeing to register a charge against company P. S.98(2) of the Companies Act made the certificate of the Registrar conclusive.
HL held that it therefore precluded the court, notwithstanding that the proceedings were proceedings for judicial review, from considering evidence adduced to show that the requirements as to registration had not been complied with.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
R v Monopolies and Mergers Commission ex parte South Yorkshire Transport Ltd
Plaintiff was a bus company that bought out some rivals. The Commission was entitled to hold an investigation into a company if, under the Fair Trading Act, the area concerned was a “substantial part...
British Railways Board and Another v Pickin
Parliament made an act that prevented land reverting to landowners once a railway company who had compulsorily purchased the land, decided to discontinue the line, as had previously been the case. A...
Racal
DPP made an application to investigate a company’s record on the grounds that it had sent fraudulent messages to customers. The high court judge said that since the section only applied to the intern...
Edwards v Bairstow
This was a case involving an error of fact by The General Commission regarding tax liability. HL set aside the commission’s decision because it was wrong on the key issue, namely that the operation i...
Dimbleby v NUJ
Plaintiff (newspapers) entered a printing agreement with T printers. NUJ was involved in a trade dispute with T, and therefore ordered its members working for Plaintiff not to supply newspapers to T...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.