Re Bradford Investments (No.2) [1991] BCLC 224
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:05:53 UTC
Defendant received shares in return for assets which contravened rules on payment for shares.
Held
Defendant could not show the assets it had provided were of any value.
Therefore court relief not granted.
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Re Ossory Estates
Company received property in consideration for issuance of shares to Defendant. Company had already resold the properties at a substantial profit. Relief from liability granted to Defendant.
Giles v Rhind
Defendant, a director, diverted company’s most lucrative contract away from company in breach of duty. As result of loss of this contract, company went into receivership and did not have enough money...
Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd
Company sold some assets to a shareholder at less than their market value. Transaction was a valid sale I.e. not a sham However as it was at an undervalue, was an unlawful distribution I.e. contraven...
Law Debenture Corp v Ural Caspian Oil
X procured L to act in breach of a restrictive covenant that L had agreed with Plaintiff (not to sell shares without Plaintiff’s permission). X then sold shares to Defendant, whom Plaintiff sued (alo...
Re Halt Garage (1964) Ltd
Issued capital of company was two shares of £1 each; one of the two shareholders who was also a director became ill and had very little to do with company, company paid her £20 a week. Payment was a...
Related free notes samples
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.