xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Re Northern Engineering [1994] 2 BCLC 704 (CA)

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Company’s articles provided that any reduction in capital would be a variation in class rights of the preference shares.

  • Defendant claimed that consent of class of preference shareholders was not required as a ‘reduction’ for purposes of articles did not include ‘cancellation’.

Held

  • ‘Reduction’ did include a ‘cancellation’

  • Therefore consent of class of non-preference shareholders was required

    • This even though in event company had not made specific provision, consent of class would not have been required.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch