xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Schöppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Z brought an action for damages against the council under Article 288 in respect of an invalid regulation on sugar pricing that caused loss to Z company.

  • In this case it was granted.

ECJ

  • To establish the non-contractual liability of Community for a legislative act concerning economic policy there have to be:

    1. A breach of a superior rule of law;

    2. The breach must be sufficiently serious; and

    3. The superior law must be one for the protection of the individual.

  • Also NB that:

A claim for any unspecified form of damages is not sufficiently concrete and must therefore be regarded as inadmissible.

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch