xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Tesco Stores Ltd v Pollard [2006] EWCA Civ 393

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Plaintiff (a child) was able to open what was supposed to be a child-resistant bottle of washing powder sold by Tesco’s and the bottle manufactured by another company (Defendant 1 and Defendant 2).

  • Plaintiff ate the powder and was ill and Defendants were sued on his behalf.

  • The company found Defendant 1 and Defendant 2 liable under the 1987 Act.

Laws LJ

  • The case came down to s.3(1) of the act, that:

There is a defect in a product for the purposes of this Part if the safety of the product is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect …

  • Here, the public were entitled to expect that the bottle would be, more difficult to open than a standard bottle top, which it was.

  • Therefore the product was not defective. 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch