Tetra Pak v Commission [1996] Case C-333/94
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:12:57 UTC
Company that had large Market share but also acquired exclusive patent and know-how license to operate in the market of cartons for milk.
-
Court took view that fact that they had those intellectual property rights strengthened their position of dominance.
Court looked not only at market share, but also at the barriers.
Comment: Are we punishing for just being better?
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Italian Flat Glass
Had three Italian companies that together held 90% Market share in Italian market of flat glass. Companies charged identical prices and maintained identical conditions of sale. Commission investigate...
Hugin v Commision
Took view that Hugin was dominant in market of spare parts for its own cash machines. Lipton was firm that serviced Hugin's machines and couldn't use any other spare parts, so COURT took view that al...
Continental Can v Commission
CC was American company that acquired German company that specialized in how to close cans. Commission felt that they had dominance in market of cans for fish, meat, and metal tops. Not relevant iden...
Bronner v Mediaprint
Little publishers, Bonner, complained that it wasn't getting access to distribution system of large media-print and this was abuse. No, there were other ways of getting distribution, they were simply...
Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd
Philips was previously the monopoly supplier of three-headed shavers to UK market. Sought to register three-headed shape as a trade mark. In light of problems due to lack of distinctiveness, Philips...
Related free notes samples
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.