xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 QB 163

Country:
United Kingdom
  • Plaintiff drove into Defendant’s car park and parked.

  • There were clauses written on the back of the ticket, not capable of being viewed before entering the car park (and paying for a ticket), stating that the car park would not be liable for injury to users caused by Defendant.

  • Defendant’s negligence led to a car crash in which Plaintiff was injured and he sued Defendant.

  • CA allowed Plaintiff’s claim. 

Lord Denning

  • The contract has already been formed by the time that the tickets are dispensed so any terms written on them are meaningless.

  • The only way a Plaintiff could be bound, is if he knows, or Defendant gave reasonably sufficient notice, that the ticket would be issued subject to a certain type of condition e.g. “exemption condition” (simply stating “subject to conditions” is inadequate since Plaintiff might consider that these would be mere regulatory conditions). 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch