Tottenham Hotspur v Princegrove Publishers [1974] 1 WLR 113
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:04:16 UTC
Lawson J summarises the result of Walsh as “if a person goes in and occupies property as tenant under an agreement, it is taken as if an instrument giving effect to the new tenancy on the agreed terms has been executed.”
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
A "lease" or "tenancy" is a legally binding agreement, independent of any other relationship between the parties. This agreement establishes a landlord and tenant relationship. Even if the parties us...
AG Securities v Vaughan and Antoniades v Villiers
There can be no exclusive possession of a property or residential accommodation without joint tenancy. Determining what constitutes joint tenancy, depends on whether the lease or tenancy agreements...
Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold
Various leases of properties had been granted. Defendant occupied the property under an arrangement under which they paid no rent. The landlord sought possession, saying that the agreements were li...
Street v Mountford
A lease (tenancy) is characterized by exclusive possession. The likelihood of it being categorized as a lease increases if someone has sole possession of the property. “An occupier of residential acc...
Javad v Aqil
A tenant was allowed into occupation of business premises in anticipation of terms being agreed for the grant of a lease. The tenant paid £2,500, which was expressed, in a receipt signed by the landl...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.