Volkswagen AG v Commission [2003] Case T-208/01
Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 2024-01-04 07:06:04 UTC
Facts
After distribution agreements had been signed, Commission found that manufacturer had sent circulars to all distributors with intention to influence the discount policy.
But no evidence that distributors had implemented this in practice.
Held
No Concerted practice
Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch Similar cases
AEG-Telefunken v Commission Case
AEG operates system of distribution throughout the EU, to be part of it, needed to accept charging the high prices. One company didn't and complained this was concerted practice. AEG thought would wi...
Italian Flat Glass
Had three Italian companies that together held 90% Market share in Italian market of flat glass. Companies charged identical prices and maintained identical conditions of sale. Commission investigate...
Michelin II
Commission took decision that Michelin was in breach of Article 102 in relation to pricing schemes for replacement tires (follow up from Michelin I ). Details of scheme were as follows: There was a q...
Woodpulp II
Scandinavian and American woodpulp producers had practice where they announced in advance the max prices they would charge for each quarter of the year, and done this between 1971-1981) Commission ar...
Bronner v Mediaprint
Little publishers, Bonner, complained that it wasn't getting access to distribution system of large media-print and this was abuse. No, there were other ways of getting distribution, they were simply...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
- Customer Support
- Sellers FAQ
- Contact Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.