xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
Law Cases
Tort Law Cases
Defective Premises Cases

Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552

Country:
United Kingdom
By Oxbridge Law Team
Lord Denning

  • Defendant was a company with a pub and the owners, L, lived above the pub. L let a room to Plaintiff. The handrail finished before the end of the stairs and Plaintiff fell down and died.

  • Plaintiff’s estate brought a claim against the company (NB the company, not L). 

  • HL held that the company was an occupier and owed a common duty of care to Plaintiff, but had not breached the duty. 

Lord Denning

  • “Occupier” in the 1957 Act means a person who has a sufficient degree of control so as to owe a common duty of care towards those who lawfully enter the premises. This instance is simply a particular example of the duty of care that a man owes to his neighbour.

  • “Where a person has a sufficient degree of control over the premises that he ought to realise that any failure on his part to use care may result in injury to a person coming there”, then he is the occupier, his guest is a visitor and O owes V a duty to use reasonable care.

  • Here, the company had merely licensed L to use the premises but had not let it to L so that it retained a sufficient measure of control.

    • However there was nothing to suggest that the short handrail was dangerous, e.g. no previous accidents.

  • It is possible to have more than one occupiers, as here. 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch

Similar cases

Ferguson v Welsh
Defendant, a council, contracted S to demolish a building, who in turn, contrary to their contract with Defendant (there was a clause prohibiting sub-contracting), subcontracted to W, who employed Pl...
Billings v Riden
Defendant was doing work to the front of a house, next door to one occupied by X, blocking the main entrance to X’s house, so that they only left a dangerous alternative route. Plaintiff, a visitor,...
Smith v Littlewoods
Negligence refers to situations where a duty of care arises. The duty of an occupier entails a responsibility to ensure the safety of their premises for visitors or guests. The duty of care towards n...
Ogwo v Taylor
In negligence involving the occupier's liability, the duty of care is fundamental. The duty of care extends to various parties, including firemen who respond to fires. In such situations, occupiers m...
Roles v Nathan (Trading As Manchester Assembly Rooms)
"Occupiers' Liability" is a common duty of care that occupiers owe to individuals who enter their premises. This duty extends to ensuring a safe environment and preventing foreseeable harm.  In cases...

Related free notes samples

Occupier's Liability Notes
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB
Occupier's Liability Notes
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find
Occupiers Liability Notes
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB
Occupiers Liability Notes
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB
Occupiers Liability Notes
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB

logo

Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.

©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.