MEDIATION
what is mediation?
= negotiation facilitated by a neutral 3rd party
confidential
how do you end up in mediation?
voluntary by consent of both parties
directed by courts (robust encouragement, but can't compel)
pre-action protocols
dispute resolution clause in contract
referred by dispute resolution scheme
best time to mediate
ideally, before litigation starts - especially if issues fully defined, claim quantified and key info disclosed already
after litigation starts - if issues not defined to the extent early mediation cannot result in settlement
suitable and unsuitable case types
suitable cases (e.g.s)
contracts for goods / services
landlord and tenant disputes
land disputes
clin neg
insurance disputes
building disputes
unsuitable cases
where precedent needed to clarify law / inform policy
where settlement not in public interest
where settlement not possible due to party's past conduct
where protective proceedings required
where SJ appropriate
PI? no automatic assumption unsuitable, but if parties refuse probably not worthwhile trying to change their mind
indicators and counter-indicators of suitability
must be prepared to and capable of discussing solution, and must be room for negotiation e.g. not suitable in simple debt claim
indicators:
result other than that possible through court ruling desired
speedy solution desired
'legal proceedings fatigue'
long-term relationship (friends, family, business etc.)
common future interest(s)
more litigation / conflicts than presented in proceedings
importance of confidentiality
more parties involved in conflict that just those in proceedings
longstanding solution essential
counter-indicators
earlier mediation attempt failed
parties are comfortable with their conflict
precedent desired
public decision desired
too great a power imbalance
parties have cultural background unsuitable for mediation
legal procedure where only court ruling can bring solution
professional ethics
mediator (BSB Code of Conduct applies to barrister-mediators)
competent
independent + neutral
must refuse to mediate if conflict of interest e.g. personal / final interest in outcome, acted for one of parties in past
impartial
act and be seen to act impartially
being repeatedly instructed by 1 firm does NOT compromise provided disclose to parties
ensure parties understand procedure
fairness between parties
manage dominating parties
avoid unconscionable conduct producing settlement
don't put undue pressure on party to settle
express concerns to parties + lawyers if suspect position misrepresented / info inaccurate; halt process if necessary
confidentiality
termination of mediation
if settlement unenforceable / illegal
explain parties have right to withdraw at any time without giving reasons
ensure documents securely and confidentially stored
barrister
position statement - ensure all allegations properly arguable + supported by instructions
don't knowingly / recklessly mislead
don't be dishonest - can't say anything know or suspect not true, even if client wants this to be done to gain stronger bargaining position
don't act for client engaging in ADR with improper motive
mediation agreement
parties must sign before mediation, usually standard form
lawyer checks and signs
= contract between mediator and parties
key clauses
scope of mediation - by reference to the dispute, making clear which issues referred
practicalities - names of parties + attendees, time, place, confirmation parties have authority to settle
confidentiality
WP
neutrality + impartiality of mediator
mediator will not reveal confidential info without consent of provider, unless required as matter of law
parties will:
NOT call mediator as witness
NOT require mediator to disclose notes made re: mediation
indemnify mediator for costs of resisting / responding to application required
mediation will be conducted under Code of Practice of mediator / organisation concerned
settlement NOT binding until recorded in writing + signed by parties
costs
position statement
lawyer drafts
purpose: brief mediator on each side's case
if directed by court / dispute resolution clause, may be a deadline by which you have to serve position statement, usually 7-14 days in advance of mediation
attach chronology + list of dramatis personae
content
heading - names + description of parties, 'without prejudice for use in mediation only', ID party on whose behalf made
make clear if going to other side or just mediator
formalities - date, time, mediator, attendees + whether they have authority to settle
facts
issues - legal and factual
key issues of primary concern
party's case on issues
party's interests and objectives
position on issues
further information if required (though no forced disclosure)
negotiations to date
key supporting docs
agreed bundle - SoCs / letter before claim, WSs disclosed by parties, expert reports, offers, documents re: quantum, correspondence etc.
confidential bundle NOT revealed to other party - common if disclosure not taken place
disclosure NOT compulsory BUT failure to disclose key documents may result in settlement being overturned
mediator will refuse to communicate offer / info to other side that is contradicted by confidential doc he is aware of
costs
party's own costs
lawyers fees for preparing position statements etc. + preparing + attending mediation
expert fees (if necessary)
standard term in mediation agreement usually = each party bears own costs BUT can agree otherwise e.g. loser pays
mediator's fee - hourly / daily, payable in advance
expenses of the mediation
venue, refreshments etc.
mediation agreement usually states split equally BUT can agree otherwise e.g. loser pays
recoverability from losing party in litigation
if the mediation agreement deals with costs, court will enforce its terms (any Tomlin order only refers to the costs other than ADR and does NOT override the mediation agreement)
if mediation agreement does NOT deal with costs, recoverable if 'incidental' to proceedings (s51 SCA)
mediation costs incurred as part of complying w/ pre-action protocol - yes
costs of a separate stand-alone mediation - no
styles
used in combination
facilitative (the norm)
does NOT give opinion on merits of case, evaluate likely outcome or put forward settlement proposals
BUT not passive - explores situation and IDs true objectives, asks Qs that test strength and weakness of case
can intervene, but not especially interventionist
evaluative / directive N.B. large overlap with conciliation
mediator evaluates dispute + expresses non binding opinion on likely outcome / suggest settlement range
only at request of both parties
record in mediation agreement or add it if request made during mediation
usually communicates opinion privately to each party, but can be joint meeting
exerts more control, interventionist, challenge parties to re-evaluate
problems: neutrality may be compromised, unlikely to have all documents, so evaluation incomplete
advantages: can speed up process, provide reality check to enable settlement
transformative
primary focus on improving relationship + communication (NOT settlement)
duty of confidentiality in mediation
confidentiality
express confidentiality clause
if no express clause, likely to be implied
can obtain injunction + damages for breach
unless mediation agreement provides otherwise mere fact parties have tried to mediate NOT confidential
general duty
party-party communications + party-mediator communications should NOT be revealed to:
court (if settlement NOT reached); or
3rd party (regardless of whether settlement reached)
duty in party-mediator communications in private meetings
confidential unless disclosing party agrees otherwise
separate and enforceable duty
exceptions
court will override if disclosure in interests of justice (can also explicitly agree in mediation agreement)
setting aside settlement agreement on grounds of economic duress, undue influence, misrep
claim against mediator or solicitor for negligence / misconduct
risk of harm to any person
to determine if settlement reached in mediation
prevent commission of crime
statutory duty of disclosure
all parties waive
can the mediator enforce the confidentiality clause?
yes - express / implied clause in mediation agreement, binds all parties to agreement (including mediator)
parties + mediator required to waive N.B. CANNOT rely on WP
can be waived in following circumstances:
important for public mediation to take place where several interested parties
parties want settlement to be made public
parties agree info from private meeting can be revealed to opposing party
legal professional privilege applies to mediation
mediation privilege?
suggestion that new common law privilege should be created for mediator-party communications, similar to legal professional privilege
without prejudice
applies to often WP clause in mediation agreement + bolstered by confidentiality clause (see above), both enforceable by injunction
applies to:
communications aimed at settlement: before mediation agreement signed, before mediation commences, during mediation:
position statement
offers + concessions
correspondence about mediation
communications created to try to persuade the parties to mediate
investigations conducted as part of mediation process
does NOT apply to:
open offers
costs offers
mark document 'WP as to costs'; or
Part 36 offer - if offeree rejects and fails...