Express/Implied Terms and Post Termination Restraints
Express Terms
S.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
At beginning of employment, employer must give written statement of particulars of employment within 2 months
Can bring claim asserting failure but failure does not give rise to claim on its own
Written particulars which statement must contain:
Names
Dates
Continuous employment periods
Pay
How calculated
Hours
S.2(4) ERA – some items must be in ONE document:
Names
Date of commencement
Date of continuous service
Rate and frequency of pay
Hours of work
Holiday entitlement
Job title
Place of work
If no formal contract or written particulars, can gather other evidence to demonstrate contract
E.g. offer letter, handbook and policies, job advert
Other terms may appear
Garden leave
Suspension without pay
Mobility clauses
I.e. may be required to work somewhere else.
Variation
Right to search
Restriction of email/internet
Implied Terms
Implication by:
Statute
Custom/past conduct
Officious bystander test
Business efficacy
Duties upon employer as implied conditions
To pay
To provide work
Arguably no longer exists as long as payment is given. Depends on facts of case, e.g. actor is dependent on publicity from work despite pay
Health and safety
Reasonable care for employee. Common law, statutory and tortious duties
References
Duty to take reasonable care if reference given (no duty to provide one)
General duty of care
Difficult to run
Mutual duties upon employer and employee
Trust and confidence
Physical/verbal abuse
Harassment
Deception
False accusations
Duties upon employee
To provide personal service
Reasonable skill, diligence and care
Good faith and confidence
Duty to obey lawful orders (if reasonable)
Post termination restraints
Confidential information
Duty can extend beyond contract but is more narrow. Must be:
Trade secret; OR
So highly confidential as to amount to a trade secret
Trade secret
Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1996]
Look at circumstances to decide what trade secret is.
Nature of employment
Nature of information
Whether employer impressed upon employee the confidentiality
Whether information could be isolated from other information which can be disclosed
Restrictive covenants
To prevent someone from doing something once relationship broken down
Court does not like control of behaviour after contract. Some allowed.
Prima facie VOID and UNENFORCABLE, UNLESS:
No further than necessary
Protect legitimate interests of business
Reasonable
Types:
Non-competition
Non-dealing
Non-solicitation/poaching of customers or employees
Blue pencil test
If term too wide but can easily be amended, court will do so
Will not redraft a clause
Reasonableness factors:
Duration of restriction
Geography
Needs/interests of business
Duties of the employer
Whether a lesser restriction would suffice
The impact of wrongful dismissal on restrictive...