_______________________________________________________
Basic theories of democratic society
Rousseau:
“Man is born free, but he is everywhere in chains”
Physical freedom relinquished for civil freedom – the ‘sovereign’ as the collective with single, general will that aims for common good
The sovereign is legislative, the executive needed to administer – these two are in constant friction
Political legitimacy comes from social contracts
The sovereign should practice direct democracy through general assemblies
Locke:
Democracy as a contract.
No divine right of Kings.
The State of Nature was complete liberty – though pre-political it was not pre-moral (natural law – everyone is equal)
Men sought civil government for the protection of property. In making the social contract, they have consented to be ruled by the will of the majority. They gain laws, judges & the executive to enforce laws, and can no longer take justice into their own hands.
Tyranny is a ruler reverting to the State of Nature & collapses the compact (separated powers) meaning self-defence is permissible again
Hobbes: submission to an absolute authority to escape the horror of the State of Nature
Strengthening democratic rule:
Mueinik: “bridge away from a culture of authority...to a culture of justification”
Jennings: Parliamentary sovereignty is fettered by the political reality that they must serve the public if they wish for re-election
Bill of Rights 1686: reorganised the constitutional balance in favour of democratic Parliament and took it away from the “pretended power” of the executive Crown (NB: now largely repealed)
Parliament Acts 1911 & 1949: stripped Lords’ right to veto
House of Lords Act 1999: removed majority of hereditary Peers
Parliamentary sovereignty
Edinburgh & Dalkeith Railway v Wauchope
Private Act for benefit of railway passed without notice as required by Standing Orders
Held: the court was not able to comment as the enrolled bill rule stipulates that a court must defer to Parliament once an Act has been passed
Lord Campbell: “look to the Parliamentary roll...no court of justice can inquire into the manner in which it was introduced into Parliament”
Duport Steels: plain and unambiguous statutory wording must be accepted by the courts
Lord Diplock: if judicial power were “judge’s sense of what is right...society will then be ready for Parliament to cut the power of the judges”
Pickin v British Railway Board
C bought some disused railway land which contained railway line that, by virtue of statute, reverted back to adjoining landowners. The railway however claimed ownership under a private Act which cancelled the reversion clause. C sought declaration that the railway Board had mislead Parliament & their standing orders had not been complied with
Held: the court is not entitled to disregard an Act of Parliament or investigate its validity
Separation of Powers
Montesquieu: “government should be set up so that no man need be afraid of another”.
The separation of powers & functions was in response to the feudalistic Estates structure in France, which represented classes of people.
He felt nobility in...