Who has parental responsibility?
1. Mothers
All mothers have parental responsibility
Herring: The rule that all mother’s automatically have parental responsibility can be explained by the fact they’ve gone through the birth process and pregnancy
Her demonstration to the child through pregnancy and acceptance of caring for the child after birth,
Means that it’s in the child’s best interests for her to have parental responsibility
2. Genetic (or those relying on a presumption of genetic parenthood) Fathers if....
CA 1989 s.2: He is married to the mother
CA 1989 s.4: He is registered as the father of the child on the birth certificate
Or he enters into a parental responsibility agreement with the mother
CA 1989 s.4: He obtains a parental responsibility order from the court
CA 1989 s.12(2): He has been granted a residence order
CA 1989 s.5(6): He has been appointed to be Guardian
He has adopted the child
3. Non Parents (but they don’t necessarily get all the rights or responsibilities that flow from being a legal parent)
CA s.5(6) Guardians
Who can be appointed by a parent
Where a residence order is made in favour of one parent, and that parents dies having appointed G
G will have his guardianship take effect on the death of the parent with the residence order –
even if another parent is still alive and has parental responsibility
Where there is no residence order, and a parent dies after appointing a guardian
Then the guardianship does not come in to effect until the other parent with parental responsibility dies
OR s.5(2) by the court
If there is no other parent with parental responsibility, then the court can appoint a guardian
Even if other guardians have already been appointed (but they are either unwilling or unsuitable to carry out the role)
However, the exception is that the courts can appoint even if there is an extant person with parental responsibility if the dead parent carried a residence order.
In deciding to appoint, the best interests of the child is the paramount consideration
Although there is no need to do the checklist of s.1(3) here.
Someone who obtains a residence order in favour of the child
Non-parents can’t apply for parental responsibility separately – but they do get it if they’re conferred with a residence order
Herring: Arguably that they should have wider powers than this
Re WB (Residence Order)
Do try and get round this with willingness to grant shared residence orders
Re A (A Child)
4. Local Authorities
LAs acquire parental responsibility if:
They obtain a care order
They obtain an emergency protection
People who do not get parental responsibility automatically, but may have some rights towards a particular child
Foster Parents
The foster parent does not get parental responsibility automatically. However, per s.3(5) CA 1989:
(1) A person who
(a) does not have parental responsibility for a particular child;
BUT (b) has care of the child
May (subject to the Provisions of the is Act, do what is reasonable in the circumstances of the case for the purpose of safe-guarding or promoting the child’s welfare
But after a year, they can apply for a residence order until the child has been in their care for three years.
Relatives
S.105 CA 1989 – Relatives include:
A grandparent, brother, sister, uncle or aunt (whether of the full blood or half blood or by affinity) or step-parent
What legal rights to relatives have?
They also benefit from s.3(5) CA 1989 if the child is in their care
They do not automatically get parental responsibility
BUT If the child has lived with them for a year, or with consent of the parents, relatives can apply for a s.8 residence order w/o need for leave of the court
Even if the child hasn’t lived with the relative for the year, they can still apply but need leave of the court
However, a relative is unlikely to be successful unless the parents consent or else are clearly unsuitable for the child
Re D (Care: Natural Parent Presumption) = despite F’s drug problem history and his many children with other women, court preferred him to the grandparents for residence.
Re H (Residence: Grandparents) – Gs who had cared for a child for six years were granted a residence order, despite M’s objections – there was a very strong relationship between Gs and the child.
They may have a stronger chance with contact, however
Re A: (S.8 order: Grandparent Application) G wanted contact with her young grandchildren after a bitter divorce.
CoA
While there is a presumption in favour of contact with parents, there is no such presumption in favour of grandparents
The relationship between G and child must be close and strong, and likely to benefit the child.
G v Kirkless MBC – Siblings have a strong right to contact, but more distant relatives less so.
What if the child is in care?
If the child is care, relatives will have a stronger case for contact
LAs, when kids are in care, have a duty to promote contact with the wider family
Re M (Contact: Grandmother’s application for leave) – order for reasonable contact between G and child –
CoA: G play a special place in any child’s affections. LA has burden of proof in proving why contact should not go ahead
Re W (A Child) (Contact: Leave to Apply)
Wilson J
The question of whether there is a presumption of contact between G and children needs to be reconsidered.
And before care, LA is under an obligation to consider placing a child with relatives before taking them into care
Re K – failure to consider extended family and not consult them before adoption was a serious flaw in procedure
BUT Re R (Adoption: Disclosure) – relatives should not be informed of potential adoption of newborn baby if M has asked the birth be kept confidential.
Should relatives have legal rights?
Why we might want to give them something formal
This argument is particularly made in favour of grandparents, which studies show that most children hold their grandparents in special affection
Grandparents are often also a source of easy child care – over women in paid work got the grandparents to care for children under-five
Where a child is disabled, there may be an even bigger role
Merrick: When parents divorce, the paternal grandparents often lose contact with their grandchildren
And therefore suffer depression as a result
We might therefore want to give grandparents a special legal status to give them some rights
Why we might not want to give them something
Kaganas and Piper: Giving grandparents rights may give them rights without the attendant responsibilities
Crook: Might also impinge on parents being able to raise their children as they wish
Douglas and Freeman: Giving grandparents rights would work against the norms that generally govern the relationship between grandparents, their children and grandchildren
The norm of non-interference is prevalent – that grandparents support and assist, but don’t interfere in the parental role.
No reciprocal idea – grandparents don’t expect anything back.
When will the court grant s.4 Applications?
Factors to take into account:
The Tripartite Test
Re H (Parental Responsibility):
1. The degree of commitment which the father has shown towards the child
2. The degree of attachment which exists between the father and child
3. The reasons the father is applying for the order
Re C: (Minors)
Mustill LJ
Was the association between the parties sufficiently enduring, and has F by his conduct during and since the application shown sufficient commitment
To justify giving F a legal status equivalent to that he would have enjoyed if the parties were married?
Previous contact and commitment
Re S
Butler Sloss P
F who has shown real commitment to the child concerned and to whom there is a positive attachment,
as well as a genuine bona fides reason for the application, ought, in a case such as the present,
to assume the weight of those duties and cement that the commitment and attachment by sharing the responsibilities for the child with M.
The child’s views and reaction to the application failing
Re C and V
Ward LJ
It was good for a child’s sense of self esteem that the child thought positively about an absent parent
So wherever possible the law should confer on a concerned father that he has that stamp of approval
Because he has shown himself willing and anxious to pick up the responsibility of fatherhood and not to deny or avoid it.
Re S (A Minor)(Parental Responsibility):
Ward LJ
Psychiatrists say how important it is that children grow up with good self-esteem and how much they need to have a favourable positive image of the absent parent.
Therefore the law should ensure it confers upon a committed father that stamp of approval,
lest the child grow up with some belief that he is in some way disqualified from fulfilling his role
the reason for the disqualification is something inherent which will be inherited by the child,
making her struggle to find her own identity all the more fraught
Concerns about misuse of the order
Re S (A Minor)(Parental Responsibility):
Ward LJ
There is all too frequently a failure to appreciate that the wide exercise of s 8 orders can control the abuse, if any,
of the exercise of parental responsibility which is adverse to the welfare of the child.
Those interferences with the day-to-day management of the child's life have nothing to do with whether or not this order should be...