Land Registration (LRA 2002)
Effect of First Registration
Effect of first registration of Fee Simples
LRA 2002 S.11(2)+(3) In every case, the legal fee simple is vested in the proprietor, regardless of whether that person held such a title
But this is subject to three exceptions:
S.11(4)(a) but this is subject to interests protected on the register and (b) overriding interests.
S.11(5) and where the proprietor is a trustee, the beneficiaries interests bind the proprietor if he has notice of them
S.11(4)(c) similarly adverse possession binds proprietors with notice of them.
What about where the first registered proprietor didn’t own the land?
One the face of it RP gets good title but previous owner has some arguments available:
When in actual occupation, the previous owner can assert ownership by way of overriding interest
A claim for alteration of the register may be available
Effect of First Registration of Leases
S.12(4) Estate vested subject only to
(a) implied and express covenants
(b) interests subject to an entry on the register
(c) overriding interests
(5) rights of beneficiaries he has notice of.
Registrable Interests (where land is not yet registered)
S.4(2) A qualifying estate is...
s.4(2)(a) Fee Simple
s.4(2)(b) Leases
Land must be registered where:
S.4(1)(a) Within two months of conveyance of the qualifying estate by sale or gift
S.4(1)(c) the grant out of a qualifying estate
(i) of a lease/sub lease
AND (ii) for valuable consideration or by gift
S.4(1)(d) A future lease is granted to take effect after three or more months from grant
S.4(1)(g) On the creation of the first legal mortgage
Voluntary Registration
Under s.3 land can also be voluntarily registered at any time if land is unregistered
Registrable Dispositions (where the land is already registered and some transaction occurs)
Dispositions within s.27
S.27(1): Transactions listed under s.27(2) must be registered – there is no legal title until this has occurred
Smith: this is more than a technicality – delay in registration will prejudice purchasers if other interests are protected or some interests become overriding prior to registration.
However, before registration, purchaser will have equitable interest by virtue of consideration, so long as there is writing to satisfy formality requirements
They can then try to gain an overriding interest instead (see below).
Those required to be registered:
S.27(2)(a)Transfers
S.27(2)(b)Leases
(i) Lease of more than seven years
Smith: is seven years enough?
If all leases registered, then would clog up Land Registry and be too expensive
Equally, commercial leases have gone done in length so need to be court by the 7 years limit rather than 21 years as per pre 2002.
(ii) future lease to take effect three or more months after grant
(iii) discontinuous leases
S.27(2)(d) The Express Grant or Reservation of an easement/profit
Those easements passing under the general words implied into transfers don’t need to be registered – they will be overriding interests (see below)
S.27(2)(f) grant of a legal charge (mortgage)
Effect of Registration
S.29(1): Purchasers with Registrable Dispositions made for valuable consideration will gain the lack of Registration Defence and gazump any previous unregistered interests
In order to gain this, purchasers need to fulfil number of requirements:
(1)C acquires property right for valuable consideration
(1)C registers property right
(1) B’s right is not recorded on the register
S.29(2) There are no overriding interests in force
There is no “good faith purchaser” defence
Midland Bank Trust Co v Green [1981]:
Lord Wilberforce:
LCA 1972 excludes a requirement of good faith for the lack of registration defence
Reason for this is that adding this in would bring with it the necessity of inquiring into the purchaser’s motives and this would lead to difficulties.
Legislative intention was clearly to eliminate necessity of inquiring into motives and states of mind.
However, effect of this may be softened by constructive trusts – see below.
Other Interests
Other interests are a residual category (“minor interests” is a misleading term because any interest can be protected by as an overriding interest by actual occupation)
Most important characteristic is that it will not bind a registered disposition unless it is entered on the register
And even then, protected minor interests enjoy no priority over earlier interests.
Some interests which can be protected (amongst others)
S.116(a) Estoppel claims
Macnair: however, estoppel will be subject to priority rules – thus the estoppel interest must be registered on the register in order to be protected against later interest.
S.116(b): Equities (claims to equitable remedies)
S.115 Rights of pre-emption
Priorities
LRA 2002 s.28: An earlier interest will defeat a latter interest
Even if that later interest is registered and the earlier interest it not
Exceptions
Registrable dispositions
S.29 (1)Where a registrable disposition of a registered estate is
1. Made for valuable consideration (so priority only given to purchasers, not voluntary transferees),
2. Registered
Any earlier unprotected interest “affecting the estate immediately before the disposition”
is defeated by the transfer unless the interest is overriding (per Schedule 3)
Overriding Interests
These will be accorded priority over all other interests whether registered or not (including registrable dispositions)
Effect = you can’t have a bona fide purchaser defence for trusts of land
Smith: is disappointing that greater purchaser protection is not given
Cos unless you have a registrable disposition you won’t be protected by unregistered minor interests of an earlier time
Despite the title appearing unencumbered.
Law Com: this will be less of a problem when compulsory electronic registration is in force
Minor interests will have be entered into register before can exist
Smith: although trusts etc. will still be outside of this....
Overriding Interests
Schedule 3 Paragraph 1: legal leases
Legal leases granted for term not exceeding seven years constitute overriding interests
Short leases requiring registration under s.4 or s.27 are not included
City Permanent BS v Miller [1952]:
Evershed MR:
As a matter of law, the use of the word "granted" in [paragraph (1) of LRA 2002], whether it be applied to the word "lease" or the word "term,"
indicates that the lease or agreement for lease which is to be an overriding interest must be a lease or agreement which is effective to create a term
therefore to constitute overriding interest, lease needs to be in a deed.
Doesn’t mean that all overriding interests must be legal interests.
But here, clear that equitable lease will not suffice to be overriding.
Cos legal leases, but not equitable interests, bind purchasers of unregistered land automatically.
Smith:
Fact that short means that too cumbersome to require registration
Also, short length of time implies that purchaser won’t be bound for too long and lessee should be protected
And short leases likely to be at full rent to will provide purchaser with income in lieu of vacant possession
Schedule 3 Paragraph 3: easements
Sch 3 Para 3(1)(a) and (b):
These must be legal, and the purchaser must either have notice of them or have been able to discover them had there been a reasonable search attempt
Me: Thus, any easements created by implied grant or reservation
AND come into being by a transfer of estate by deed
Will constitute overriding interests.
Except Sch 3 Para 3(2):
The exception does not apply where the person exercises the easement within a year previous to the date of disposition.
Schedule 3 Paragraph 2: actual occupation
When this applies
This paragraph (formerly LRA 1925 s.70(1)(g)) covers
“the interests belonging at the time of the disposition to a person in actual occupation of the land
So far as relating to land of which he is in actual occupation”
Boland – these apply to equitable interests as well.
Requirements
1. The person claiming must have an proprietary interest in the land
Three types of claim as proprietary for registered land:
S.116: Equities (claims to equitable remedies)
S.116 Estoppel claims
S.115 Rights of pre-emption
But not personal rights
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965]: H and W live in MH. H deserts W, but conveys MH and business premises to C for mortgage. H defaults. W attempts to resist sale of house as claims overriding interest.
Lord Hodson:
Personal rights cannot be overriding interests – to be so they must endure with the land and passing of ownership.
Rights of wife are personal only in absence of any other indication.
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981]:
Lord Scarman:
A wife has a beneficial interest in the land from contributing to the purchase price (from a resulting trust, as it turns out)
She enjoyed "rights," one of which, her right to occupation, was certainly an interest "subsisting in reference" to registered land.
Therefore, since she has actual occupation, her minor interest can be converted to an overriding interest.
Scope of para 2
Smith: what rights should fall within para 2?
Although perhaps not all rights should be held as not covered, it is possible that a wider range should be recognised as proprietary now registration is norm.
2. Actual...