The modern rules on sale are found in the consolidating statute, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SGA 1979). The underlying rule is that the transfer is based upon the intention of the contracting parties (the buyer and seller).
Sale of Goods Act (SGA) 1979 S2 Contract of Sale
S5 Existing or Future Goods
S12 Implied terms about title, etc.
S16 Goods must be ascertained Subject to section 20A, where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. S17 Property passes when intended to pass
S18 Rules for Ascertaining Intention Unless a different intention appears, the following are rules for ascertaining the intention of the parties as to the time at which the property in the goods is to pass to the buyer: Rule 1.- Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made, and it is immaterial whether the time of payment or the time of delivery, or both, be postponed. Rule 2.- Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods and the seller is bound to do something to the goods for the purpose of putting them into a deliverable state, the property does not pass until the thing is done and the buyer has notice that it has been done. Rule 3.- Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state but the seller is bound to weigh, measure, test, or do some other act or thing with reference to the goods for the purpose of ascertaining the price, the property does not pass until the act or thing is done and the buyer has notice that it has been done. Rule 4.- When goods are delivered to the buyer on approval or on sale or return or other similar terms, the property in the goods passes to the buyer —
Rule 5.- (1) Where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained or future goods by description, and goods of that description and in a deliverable state are unconditionally appropriated to the contract, either by the seller with the assent of the buyer or by the buyer with the assent of the seller, the property in the goods then passes to the buyer; and the assent may be express or implied, and may be given either before or after the appropriation is made.
(3) Where there is a contract for the sale of a specified quantity of unascertained goods in a deliverable state forming part of a bulk which is identified either in the contract or by subsequent agreement between the parties and the bulk is reduced to (or to less than) that quantity, then, if the buyer under that contract is the only buyer to whom goods are then due out of the bulk —
(b) the property in those goods then passes to that buyer. (4) Paragraph (3) applies also, with the necessary modifications, where a bulk is reduced to (or to less than) the aggregate of the quantities due to a single buyer under separate contracts relating to that bulk and he is the only buyer to whom goods are then due out of that bulk. S20 Passing of Risk
S20A Undivided Shares in goods forming part of bulk
S20B Deemed consent by co-owner to dealings in bulk goods S61 Interpretation “specific goods” means goods identified and agreed on at the time a contract of sale is made [ and includes an undivided share, specified as a fraction or percentage, of goods identified and agreed on as aforesaid]; |
---|
A contract of sale of goods is “a contract by which the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a money consideration, called the price.” (S2(1)).
‘Property’: means the ‘general property’ in goods, and not merely a special property (S61)
‘General property’ includes lesser titles to property. We know this from the language of S12.
S12 includes an implied term that the seller is able to transfer the best title. This suggests that it applies to cases where the seller doesn’t have the best title.
The Act makes a distinction between a contract for sale and other contracts/agreements:
“A ‘contract of sale’ includes an agreement to sell as well as a sale” (S61)
There is a sale if title is actually transferred under the contract
Whereas an agreement is for the transfer to take place in the future
Barter (chattel for a chattel) is not a mode of conveyance. You would need to transfer title by deed or delivery.
Flynn v Mackin: was not a contract of sale because no fixed price. Therefore, property did not pass because there was no delivery.
It is therefore clear that the contract for sale itself has the effect of transferring title to the buyer.
Note the contrast with land law: you cannot transfer the fee simple in land simply be contract. Contracts agree to the sale but the conveyance itself requires compliance with formalities
Flynn v Mackin (1974)- Irish SC Facts: D2 (Mr Mahon) agreed to supply D1 (Mr Mackin) with a new motor car in return for 250 and the delivery of D1’s used car. It was understood that D2 would have to procure the new car from a 3rd party. D2 obtained the new car from X and telephones D1 informing him, and D1 arranged to take delivery of the new car on the same day. While driving it to the place of delivery for this purpose, D2 collided with a car in which C was a passenger. C was severely injured and sued D1 and D2 for damaged for negligence. Issue was whether the property was vested in D1 at the time of the accident. Held (Walsh J): Property in the new car had not vested in D1 at the time of the accident. The agreement between them was one in barter and was not an agreement for the sale of goods within the Act. |
---|
We are often concerned with the exact point at which the seller’s proprietary interest in the goods is transferred to the buyer. This is because the transfer effects the performance of the parties’ contractual rights and duties.
There is a...