Advanced Criminal Litigation
Interview Revision
Interview = ‘The questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences’ Code C para 11.1A
Code C 11.1A Investigating officer must provide you with sufficient information to understand the nature of the offence and why D is suspected
Seek officers view on bail
Is D fit and well? Capacity?
Solicitor allowed to be present Code C 6.8
Opening Statement
I am [name] a solicitor with [firm name] I am now required to explain my role. My role is to advance and protect my clients rights. I shall continue to advise my client throughout the interview and if necessary I shall ask that the interview be stopped in order to allow me to advise my client in private
I shall intervene in the interview if:
My client asks for all need legal advice
Your questioning or behaviour is inappropriate
Information or evidence has been referred to that has not been disclosed to me before this interview
Clarification of any matter is required or
A break is required
After receiving legal advice my client has decided:
[Either]
To exercise his right to silence [if appropriate to give a reason for this advice] because [reason]. Please respect that decision. [My client is however prepared to hand you a written statement about this matter.]
[or]
To answer any questions which you may raise which are relevant to my client's arrest all voluntary attendance.
Can stop interview at any time
CAN NOT answer questions on client behalf
Code C 6D can intervene to challenge or seek clarification on improper question
Options:
Answer ALL questions
No comment
Selective Silence
No comment and written statement
Reasons to intervene
Challenge in proper questions
Challenge inappropriate questions
Wide questions
Leading
Statement rather than a question
Multiple questions
Hypothetical questions
Marathon questions
Rapid fire
Inappropriate police behaviour
Leading questions
Misrepresenting the law
Asserting guilt with no evidence
Inaccurate summarising
Own opinion
Interrupting
Protracted silence
Inappropriate demands such as eye contact
Repetitive questions
Bullying
Questioning a defendant’s right to silence
Questions after denial
Problem behaviour from client
Defendant distressed
Lying
Swearing
Other unacceptable behaviour
Right to silence:
s34 CJPOA 1994
If under caution and fails to mention facts which are then relied on in defence
Court MAY draw inference that D is lying or did not mention earlier as would not stand up to scrutiny
R v Argent (1997) look at age, circumstances and legal advice given
s36
Marks or signs on body/clothing which are not explained by D
Applies irrespective of a defence
Court MAY draw inference if D...