Rights protecting product designs (Design Right and Registered Design)
Sources |
|
---|---|
Types | Go on IPO website - browse by product type |
Aims | To encourage and protect innovative designs |
Registered Design
Stage 1 - Validity and Ownership Q
Registrability of designs | Set out in s.1 to 1D |
---|---|
What is a design? |
|
What is a product? | - s.1(3) a product may be an ‘industrial or handicraft’ item. Therefore, some items have protection of RDA (if reg’d) and CPDA automatically |
Requirements for registration | - s.1B(1) design must be new and have individual character and must not fall w/in stat exclusions |
What does ‘new’ mean? |
|
Exceptions |
|
What does ‘individual character’ mean? |
|
Exclusions from registration | Even if design meets requirements of novelty and individual character, it might be excluded:
|
Authorship and ownership | S.2(3) person who creates it. Author will be 1st owner unless:
|
Duration | - registration gives protection for an initial period of 5 yrs (s.3C(2) -s.8(1)) and can be extended under s8(2) for further periods of 5 yrs up to a maximum 25 yrs |
Stage 2
Infringing act | S.7(2) provides a non-exhaustive list of activities that will constitute ‘use’:
Generally, these acts will only infringe RDR if they are done for commercial purposes s.7A(2)(a) |
---|
Stage 3
Comparison of designs | Design used by D must be compared w/Cl’s design as registered. It is imp to obtain a copy of the design as it appears on IPO Comparison is same test as individual character and informed user will again need to be a person who has knowledge re recent designs and trends w/in relevant field. |
---|
Stage 4 and 5
Stage 4 - Defences | Most imp stat defences are:
Separately, the D may argue that Cl has not made out its case or that design should never have been reg’d in first place |
---|---|
Stage 5 - Remedies | Express provisions at ss.24A-D |
Unregistered Design Right (‘UDR’)
Background |
|
---|---|
Source | Part III CDPA |
Stage 1 - Subsistence and Ownership
What is a design? | S.213(2) provides that design means “the design of any aspect of the shape or configuration (whether internal or external) of the whole or part of an article’ Nb. Here we are concerned with ‘article’ rather than ‘product’ (RPDA) Doesn’t have to be appealing, can just be functional |
---|---|
Criteria for protection |
|
Originality | - UDR subsists in ‘original design’ s.213(1)
|
Fixation |
|
Exclusions |
|
Ownership |
|
Duration |
|
Stage 2
Infringing act |
A new design doc (eg a drawing) of design will infringe if it is made for the purpose of making a copy of article. |
---|
Stage 3
Comparison |
|
---|---|
Causal link | Can be established by proving D has had
|
Stage 4 and 5
Stage 4 - Defences |
|
---|---|
Stage 5 - Remedies | S.229(2) if cl establishes infringement then: damages, account of profits, injunction or other remedies. Additional remedies in CPDA include: delivery up and disposal of infringing articles |
Copyright vs Reg’d Design
Copyright | Reg’d Design | |
---|---|---|
Ads |
|
|
Disads |
| - needs to be reg’d |
s.51 CPDA
Limits the application of dimensional shift copying in s.17(3) by essentially providing if a party copies a 2D artistic work directly into 3D form, it will only be infringement of C if 3D item that copier has produced is an artistic work in its own right.
Is 3D article an artistic work in its own right? Eg sculpture, architecture, artistic craftsmanship
No - no infringement of C in drawing
Yes - C in drawing infringed
s.52 CPDA
If an artistic work industrially exploited [ie. By making over 50 copies] by making an ‘article’ and marketed, period of protection falls to 25 yrs but only for certain infringements. These are the making of an article or copying a design...