Core Issues:
What are the responsibilities of the LA?
When to help?
When to take compulsory measures?
How to identify harm or risk of harm?
How to identify perpetrator of harm- if not parents cause harm, take away child from them is good?
When is state intervention justified?
How to judge standard of care?
Duty to report to local authority to protect children ie. Neighbour, GP, teacher
Key Principles:
Non intervention
Respect sanctity and privacy of family unless child is likely to be harmed
Lord McKay: “integrity and independence of the family is the basic building block of a free and democratic society and the need to defend it should be clearly perceivable in law...unless there is evidence a child is being or likely to be positively harmed because of a failure in the family, the state...should not interfere”
Compulsory measures can only betaken following court order
Bare minimum to satisfy the courts before court giving order- S1(1) overall welfare in children to give order
Threshold conditions : s31(2) CA 1989
S1(5)
Art 8: any intervention must be proportionate
Working in partnership
LA must work in partnership with parents
Try to make voluntary arrangements
Provision of services not a mark of failure on the family
Maintenance of links between child and family
Promote upbringing of children by their families
Presume and promote contact between children and parents- presumption of benefit of contact
Adoption to separate link between children and family is the last resort
LA try to rehabilitate the family
LA gives support to family
But is the rehabilitation too much? Baby P case http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11626806 & Poppy Widdison
Uphold good social work practice
Provision of Services – Assistance
General duty to children in need
S17(1): every LA has a duty to
: promote and safeguard the welfare of children in their area who are in need, and
: so far as is consistent with that duty to promote the upbringing of children by their families, by providing a range and level of services appropriate to those needs
S17(10): a child is defined as being in need if
he is unlikely to achieve or maintain or have opportunity to achieve or maintain a reasonable standard of health and development without the provision of services for him by LA
his health or development is likely to be significantly impaired or further impaired without provision of such services
he is disabled
Exercise is up to LA to decide on the needs and the budget of LA
S17(11): health (physical or mental), development(physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural)
How would LA discharge this general duty?
S17(3): services may be provided for the family of the particular child in need of for any member of his family if they are provided with the view to safeguarding or promoting child’s welfare
Does not need to be actual relative
What are the kind of services provided?
Giving assistance in kind or cash- baby coupons for diapers and milk powder
Contribute to cost of looking after child- every child has access to basic child care, LA will adjust depend on each child’s situation
Facilitate provision of services by others
Specific Duties and Powers:
In pursuing the general duty under S17(1), the LA has some specific duties: Sch 2
Identification of children in need
Take reasonable steps to identify
Publish information about the services they provide
Take reasonably practicable steps to ensure that those who need services receive information about them
Promote upbringing of children by their families
Make provision for advice, guidance, counselling and home help
May provide activities/facilities to encourage this
If child is being looked after, endeavour to promote contact unless it is against his welfare
Provide family centres
Prevent abuse and neglect
Duty to inform another LA if child lives or going to live there
Use services to prevent abuse and neglect
Provide accommodation to 3rd party to protect children
Day care
Required to provide such day care as is appropriate for those under 5
Provide facilities for those caring for children in day care
Facilitate provision of day care by other agencies
Duty to consider racial groups
In the provision of day care or recruiting foster parents
General Duty of Investigation:
S47(1): where a LA
(a) are informed that a child who lives or is found in their area is (i) the subject of an Emergency Protection Order, or (ii) is in police protection
(b) has reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives or is found in their area is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm
Then, the LA:
Shall make or cause to make such enquiries as they consider necessary to enable them to decide what action they should take to safeguard the child’s welfare
In discharging this duty, the LA does not work alone
Local Safeguarding Children Boards: decide on issues of policy and practice at local level
Local Child Protection Team: hold conference to decide individual cases
3 types of child protection conferences: initial, review, and pre birth
Decide whether child should be placed or kept on a child protection plan
S47 is the first step taken by a LA when a question of child protection arises
Does not mean an investigation will result in compulsory measures
Try to resolve problem by providing services or co -operation
S37 (1): Court may also direct the LA to investigate if, in the course of any hearing, court feels that a compulsory order may be necessary
S37(3): after investigation, LA must inform the courts of their decided course of action and reasons why
Emergency Protection Orders:
EPO: allows for the immediate removal or retention of a child in a genuine emergency (triggering LA)
X Council v. B (EPO) [2004]: court must be satisfied that no other less radical form of order can safeguard the welfare of the child...imminent danger must be actually established
S44(1): where any person applies for an EPO, court may only make the order if it is satisfied
there is reasonable cause to believe child is likely to suffer significant harm if (i) he is not removed to accommodation provided by applicant or(ii) if he does not remain in the place where he is currently accommodated
if LA is the applicant, court must be satisfied that (i)enquiries are being made under S47, (ii) and those enquiries are being frustrated by access to the child being unreasonably refused + LA has reasonable cause to believe access to the child is required as a matter or urgency
if applicant is an authorised person , and (i) applicant has reasonable cause to suspect child is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm or (ii) applicant is making enquiries with respect to child’s welfare
S44(4): EPO allows removal of child from premises or prevention of removal of child
Also gives holder PR
S44(5): limited PR, limited power of removal or retention – only to safeguard child’s welfare
S44(6): court may impose appropriate direction for contact or for medical or psychiatric examination of child
S44A: court can attach exclusion requirements for EPO
S45: EPO not exceeding 8 days, can extend once for a further 7 days
In summary, investigation may be triggered in a number of ways:
By information – S 47 (1) (b)
By court order – S37
By EPO – S47(1)(a)
Further, if investigation is being frustrated, LA may apply for EPO to gain access to the child and protect him, or apply for S43 Child Assessment Order
Once investigation is under way, LA have a number of options.
May decide to provide services to support the family
But may sometimes need to apply for compulsory orders in order to safeguard child
If compulsory measures must be taken, LA must first hold a legal planning meeting
Decide whether the legal criteria has been met in principle and whether it would be in child’s best interests to proceed
If so, parents must be informed
Court may only make compulsory orders upon application
S31(9): only LA or authorised person can make application
The child and any person with PR will automatically be party to the proceedings
Fathers without PR will not automatically be parties, but will normally be informed.
Normally will be permitted to join as party to proceedings unless good reason not to allow it
2 types of Compulsory Orders: (must be issued by courts and LA have to satisfy legal criteria to apply one of the orders)
Supervision order
Care order
Supervision Order:
Less draconian than care order
Puts child under the supervision of the designated LA
Does not vest PR in the LA- child remain at home
Court can make supervision order + S8 order
Court cannot make SUPERVISION ORDER + CARE ORDER
S35(1): The designated supervisor has a duty to:
advice, assist and befriend the child
Take such steps as reasonably necessary to give effect to the order, and where
The order is not wholly complied with, or the supervisor considers that the order is no longer necessary, to consider whether to apply to court for variation or discharge
Last for one year can be extended to max. three years
Child remains at home
But order subjects the child to certain directions by the supervisor, regardless of whether child or parent consents
See Sch 3 Para 2
Care Order:
Places the child in the care of LA
S33: LA is required to receive the child into their care and keep him in their care while the order is in force and PR is vested in the LA
S33(3): LA can decide the extent to which parents or other persons with PR can exercise their PR – but parents do not lose PR
S91(12): Care order lasts until a child is 18 unless brought to an end...