xs
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

#16663 - Post Death Arrangments - Private Client

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Private Client Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

POST-DEATH ARRANGEMENTS

The way in which an estate is left on death is not final. Beneficiaries and trustees can redirect dispositions of property in an estate following death, e.g. to provide for family members who may be less well off than the beneficiary, or to save tax, usually IHT.
Precatory Trusts
  • A beneficiary passes assets they have been left in a will to other people in accordance with a record of wishes left by the testator.

  • S.143 IHTA 1984: provided the beneficiary carries out the wishes within 2 years of death, IHT is charged as if the property had been left in accordance with the wishes of the deceased.

Wills Creating Two-Year Discretionary Trusts
  • S.144 IHTA 1984: if property is left on discretionary trust and an appointment, which would have led to an IHT charge, is made within 2 years, there is no exit charge on the appointment and instead the appointment is, in effect, read back into the will.

  • Advantages:

    • Effective two-year survivorship period available

    • No consents required

    • No election required (although it is usual to include an express election)

Disclaimers
  • No one can be forced to accept a gift – beneficiaries can thus disclaim, but whole of the gift must be disclaimed.

  • There is an automatic reading back for tax purposes*.

  • The property passes in accordance with the will or intestacy and the original beneficiary has no control over who will ultimately benefit.

Variations
  • If a beneficiary does accept a gift, they are free to dispose of that property as they think fit – they can vary entitlement to that property (at any time).

  • BUT if the property is accepted and then re-routed, there could be adverse tax consequences:

    • PET for IHT purposes, so if they die within 7 years, it will eat into NRB

    • Disposal for CGT, so if the asset has increased in value since death, there could be an immediate charge to CGT

* Reading Back for Tax Purposes separate elections can be made for IHT and CGT

Inheritance Tax – s.142(1) IHTA 1984

Where within two years after a person’s death, any of the dispositions of the deceased’s estate are varied or disclaimed in writing, they shall be read back and treated as though the variation had been effected by the deceased, or in the case of disclaimer, as though the gift had never been conferred.

Capital Gains Tax – s.62(6) TCGA 1992

Similar provisions apply for CGT – effect:

  • It will not be treated as a disposal by the variator.

  • Shall apply as if the variation had been effected by the deceased, or in the case of disclaimer, as though the gift had never been conferred.

  • Consideration for the variation – s.142(3) IHTA 1984 & s.62(8) TCGA 1992:

    • Reading back does not apply to a variation/disclaimer made for any consideration in money or money’s worth other than consideration considering of the making, in respect of another disposition of the deceased, of a variation or disclaimer that qualifies for relief.

  • Multiple variations:

    • A particular item of property can only be redirected once.

    • However, rectification of the original variation may be possible – Lake v Lake [1989].

    • A beneficiary can redirect a number of different items of property within the two-year period.

Advantages of Reading Back Example:

To make full use of

available reliefs

T, under his will, left:

  • A pecuniary legacy of 425,000, subject to tax, to his only child, S (IHT is 40,000).

  • A specific legacy of his 51% holding in T Ltd [worth 425,000] to his wife, W.

  • Residue [worth 500,000] to wife for life, remainder to S.

  • S could vary his legacy in favour of W, in consideration of her varying the interest in T Ltd in his favour, which through the availability of business property relief, would mean no IHT will be payable on the estate.

To avoid reservation of

benefit rules

  • T, by his will, gives Greenacre to his daughter D.

  • She gives Greenacre to her son G, within two years, but continues to reside there.

To take increases in value since death outside the

IHT charge

  • Under his will, T left his entire estate (worth 200,000) to his wife (who has no estate of her own).

  • 18 months...

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
Private Client