Outline the differences between a trustee and a fiscal agent and advise which would be best for Alexandria. Explain whether Christine is right or not, giving your reasons.
Choosing between a trustee and a fiscal agency (can’t have both) Technically you could have both but this would involve unnecessary fees, duplication of roles and extra administrative load. where security is not offered and there are no subordination issues, a Fiscal Agent will usually be the best option for the issuer | ||
---|---|---|
TRUSTEE | FISCAL AGENT | |
WHO APPOINTS THEM | Appointed by Issuer | Appointed by issuer (it is the issuer’s representative and agent) |
¿DUTY OWED TO? | Owed under common law and contract (via the trust deed) to the Bondholders | Owed to issuer (via Fiscal Agency Agreement) |
COST | More Expensive as will have to hire a specialist Trust Co. – will also need to pay for a Paying Agent | Cheaper as there are more banks willing to act as Agents – “en plus” the Fiscal Agent also performs role of Paying Agent (pay once only) |
¿WHAT IS THEIR ROLE? |
|
|
SECURED ISSUES |
| Can’t hold security on trust for BHs as he is agent of the issuer and thus acts in the issuer’s interests. |
SUBORDINATED ISSUES |
| Need different agents for senior & junior issues to ensure effective subordination |
ADVANTAGES TO THE BH’s “suing” | In event of default
Insolvency
Issuer’s view
| |
ADVANTAGE TO THE ISSUER | Where an Event of Default occurs
|
|
On the facts, it looks like a fiscal agent will be more appropriate as Tom wants to save costs & doesn’t have any subordination or any security.
However, an advantage of having a trustee is that both the BHs & the issuer can deal through a middle man. See p13 notes for advantages for BH & Issuer
However, this will cause more cost for Tom which he want to avoid (reason in table above)
Christine is incorrect. You can’t have both as they are legally conflicting.
Trustee takes security over & holds legal title to chose in action = covenant to pay. Responsible for BHs
Fiscal agent doesn’t take legal title to anything and is responsible for Issuer.
Managers and Lead Managers ¿Will the managers be liable to Alexandria if something goes wrong? If so, how? Is there any other agreement which will indirectly affect this?
¿WHO? |
|
---|---|
ROLE OF LEAD MANAGER |
|
ROLE OF MANAGERS (SYNDICATE) |
|
LIABILITY |
|
Warranties and Representations. ¿To whom will Alexandria (the issuer) make representations and warranties? Why?
Reps & Wars in subscription agreement given by issuer to each manager
This is done because managers are middle men trying to sell bonds on. Therefore they need to know the info the issuer is telling them is true & accurate when they are pitching to potential investors. They want to make sure there is a sensible amount of disclosure made.
Also they need to know it’s worth to sign up in the 1st place. Lessens risk.
Managers want the reps & wars as they will underwrite whole amount before they sell one. Therefore window of great risk which they need to mitigate.
Clearing Systems
Debt Securities: Key Documents:
Subscription Agreement + Prospectus/Listing Particulars (Similar to Facilities Agreement)(See WS(9))
Trust Deed or Fiscal Agency Agreement (Between Issuer and Fiscal Agent)
Paying Agency Agreement (If trust is used, need principal Paying Agent)
T&Cs (e.g. offer is made in certain jurisdictions, interest paid, negative pledge, tax, events of default)
Definitive Bearer Bonds | Definitive register bonds | Global Note | |
---|---|---|---|
Transferral “old System” | Transferred by physical delivery | By a change to the register – need instrument of transfer and original bond certificate to be filed | Through clearing systems (the bonds are fungible) using 2 accounts & instruction to the clearer |
How is Entitlement proved | They are in Paper form. Prove ownership by presentation on maturity (or on sale). Handing over the bond passes ownership. Tear-off coupons are used to claim interests. Not used any more due to risk of loss, theft & expensive to print loads (admin costs) See below Modern System | In the form of a Certificate with name on it. Handing over the certificate does not pass ownership. Ownership passes by entering name on register. Not used anymore due to risk of loss, theft & expensive (costs of registrar) See below ... |