_______________________________________________________
Distinguishing a Lease from a Licence:
Lease | Licence |
---|---|
Property right | Personal right |
Exclusive possession | No exclusive possession |
Binds third parties | Doesn’t bind third parties |
Security of tenure | No security |
Something that looks like a lease but fails to satisfy the ingredients of a lease will be a licence (personal right)
Characteristics of a lease
A landlord grants a leasehold title out of his own title, which will be an interest which lasts longer than the leasehold, to a tenant.
Street v Mountford
S charged Mrs Mountford 37 p/w as a ‘licence fee’ with 14 days’ notice for termination. She signed a form saying she agreed that the Rent Act didn’t apply to her. She challenged this as she wanted to be under the protection of the Act
Held: Mrs Mountford had a lease despite the express intention behind the contract
Lord Templeman: “the only intention which is relevant is the intention demonstrated by the agreement to grant exclusive possession for a term at a rent.”
Heslop v Burns
H allowed the Burns to live in a cottage rent free & integrated with the family, becoming godfather of their daughter & paying her school fees. They remained after the death of the owner & sought to establish a leasehold title to the cottage
Held: they were licencees because there was no intention to create legal relations. This case confirms that whilst rent is NOT a prerequisite of a valid lease (S.205(1)17) LPA 1925) it will be a factor suggestive of personal rights only
Certainty of term
Sweet & Maxwell: “the grant of a right to the exclusive possession of land for a determinate term less than that which the grantor has himself in the land”
The term must be fixed or periodic.
Fixed term lease:
S.52 LPA 1925 the lease much be expressly created
The maximum possible length of the lease is established when it is created and it has a definite start & end date
Lace v Chantler – ‘duration of the war’ was too vague to be fixed
Prudential Assurance Co – the ability to terminate the lease on either side, however, doesn’t destabilise the fixed term
An uncertain tenancy transforms into a lease for life, which is 90 years under S.149(6) LPA 1925
Periodic lease:
Express/implied by rent calcualtions
Ladies’ Hosiery v Parker – length of lease determined by the period by which the rent is calculated (not the date its due)
Usual quarter days are common – 25 March, 24 June, 29 Sep & 25 Dec
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Cooperative
Tenant resisted possession order because he said the agreement had created a valid lease for life
Held: his appeal succeeded & it was found that he had a fixed term lease, determinable under the according conditions, despite the fact the lease ran from month to month
Exclusive possession
The right to possess at the exclusion of all others – including the landlord
Factors which indicate circumstances that do not determine exclusive possession:
If the landlord can introduce others to the land (Antoniades v Villiers)
Street v Mountford confirms, however, that if this right is for appearances only then it will not denigrate from the proprietary nature of the right i.e. its being a lease
If the landlord has unrestrained access – eg a key which he is free to use (Aslan v Murphy) unless it’s only for emergencies/arranged visits in which case this doesn’t count against the claimant trying to establish exclusive possession however.
Only partial exclusive possession of the property as a whole – eg of a certain room within a property (Vesely v Levy)
Business tenancies for a space within a building lend more towards licences (Desden Estates v Collinson)
Multiples leases
Co-ownership of a lease is governed by the same principles as freehold estates – see ‘Co-Ownership’ doc
Formalities
(See ‘Land Registration’ doc)
Legal leases
7< years
S.52 LPA by deed
S.1 Law of Property (Misc Prov) Act signed by grantor, attested & delivered
S.27(2)(b)...