Categories of interests
Legal interests
Bind the whole world: no need for notice or registration – binds a purchaser simply because it’s legal
Exception: puisne mortgage (not protected by deposit of title deeds with lender) which must be registered as a land charge
Equitable interests subject to registration under the LCA 1972
Land Charges Act 1972 (which replaced LCA 1925)
Some 3rd party interests must be registered
Registration constitutes notice: s199 LPA 1925
If these interests are not registered, a purchaser of the land is not bound
Section 2 LCA 1972 - Interests which have to be registered – all given letters and numbers:
Puisne mortgage: C (i) – S2(4)(i) LCA 1972
General equitable charge: C (iii) - S2(4)(iii) LCA 1972
Equitable mortgage (where not by deed or not registered)
Estate contract: C(iv) (S2(4)(iv) LCA 1972
Right of pre-emption
Cannot be registered until owner decides to sell - Pritchard v Briggs
Option to purchase or contract of purchase
Equitable lease (contract for legal lease)
Inland Revenue Charge: D(i) – S2(5)(i)LCA 1972
Restrictive covenant: D(ii) – S2(5)(ii) LCA 1972
only applies to restrictive covenants btw freeholders and doesn’t apply to those created before 1926 (protected by doctrine of notice)
Equitable easement: D(iii) – S2(5)(iii) LCA 1972
Equitable when it’s not by deed or its for an uncertain period of time – must be registered as a land charge to be binding
Equitable easement created before 1926 – protected by old doctrine of notice
Spouse’s right to occupy home under Family Law Act 1996: F – S2(7) LCA 1972
Incorrect Registration
Registration must be against the correct name(s) of the estate owner(s) at the time of the creation of the land charge: s3(1) LCA 1972 – if not then registration is a nullity: Diligent Finance Co Ltd v Alleyne:
In Standard Property Investment v British Plastics Federation: version of the name(s) as appears in the title deeds and not as it appears in other contexts (birth certificate etc.)
Effect of failure to register land charge
Unregistered C(i), C(iii) or F - void vs. a purchaser for value of any interest in the land – S.4(5),(8) LCA 1972
Unregistered C(iv), D(ii), or D (iii): void vs. a purchaser of the legal estate for money or moneys’ worth – S.4(6) LCA 1972
And only through money or moneys’ worth – doesn’t include marriage consideration
Midland Bank Trust v Green: nominal consideration is still good consideration
Overreachable Interests
Same as with registered land – a beneficial interest under a trust is overreached by payment of capital money to two trustees: Ss2 and 27 LPA 1925
Interests still subject to the Doctrine of Notice
Those explicitly excluded from the LCA 1972:
Pre-1926 restrictive covenants
Equitable easements
Beneficial interest under a trust where sale or mortgage is by only one legal owner
Mere equities
Interests arising by estoppel
Interests still subject to the doctrine of notice are enforceable vs. anyone except “Equity’s darling” – ‘‘a bona fide purchaser for value of a legal estate without notice’
Three types of notice
Actual: purchaser actually knows of the equitable interest (codified through s198(1) LPA 1925)
Constructive: requires purchaser to act as a prudent person – s199 (1)(ii)(a) LPA 1925
Obligations – to (1) make a proper investigation of the title deeds (2) make a proper investigation of the land - E.g. look for worn tracks etc.
Hunt v Luck: presence of a tenant on the land placed the purchaser on constructive notice of the tenant’s legal lease
Imputed:
Where notice received by the buyer’s agent...