_______________________________________________________
Personal & Property Rights
Estates in Land
Technically all land is owned by the Crown and the doctrine of tenure means that people don’t own land, but own estates in land:
In possession
In remainder
In reversion
Personal rights = pertaining to the person – extinguishes upon death
Licences (contractual or gratuitous)
Property rights = pertaining to the physical place - runs with the land
Estates
Freehold – freeholder’s life & life of heirs - fee simple absolute in possession
Commonhold (novel) = freehold units in a commonhold community
Leasehold estates: create relationship of landlord and tenant
Tenant/lessee/grantee of lease = exclusive possession
Sublease/underlease
For a clear term or periodic – in all cases certain – ‘time’ defined in advance
Proprietary interests
Mortgages
Easements
Covenants (obligation to do or not to do something)
Options to purchase
Equitable shares of ownership (co-ownership rights)
Equity by estoppel (S.116 LRA 2002)
Trespasser = no rights over the land
Tenancy at will – often follow on from an expired lease. Undetermined status (not protected by LTA 1954 so would appear to be more like a licence; however it might also be a grant of exclusive possession for a term at a rent which may be enough to give the occupier a protected tenancy)
Non-proprietary leases?
Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust
Trust was granting a licence to use properties as temp. homeless accom on a weekly rental basis. C claimed he was a tenant as he wanted to enforce a covenant
Held: (HL) the grant of exclusive possession created a tenancy; though statute differentiated between different types of landlrods, it could not change the character of the property interest
Kay v Lambeth Council
Informal agreement with housing trust ‘short life’ licence. Upon the Bruton decision, Lambeth terminated the now ‘tenancy’. Kay claimed to have become a tenant of Lambeth on termination of the lease.
Held: valid non-proprietary tenancy, but it would not bind the owner of the estate
Dixon “slight of hand” to afford would-be contractual licensee certain rights of tenants
National Provincial Bank v Ainsworth
Lord Upjohn “I am of the opinion that the rights of husband and wife must be regarded as purely personal…the wife is asserting rights over the land of another and in respect of which she has no beneficial ownership”
Lord Wilberforce “Before a right or an interest can be admitted into the category of property, or of a right affecting property, it must be definable, identifiable by third parties, capable in its nature of assumption by third parties, and have some degree of permanence or stability”
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages
Held: (SC) the claimant’s rights (Mrs Scott) were merely personal, because the person she contracted with had no interest in the land at the time of the contract – hence they could not bind the bank (Southern Pacific)
Defining Land
S.205(1)(ix) LPA 1925
“land of any tenure, and mines and minerals, whether or not held apart from the surface, buildings and parts of buildings (whether division is horizontal, vertical or made in any way) and other corporeal hereditaments; also a manor, advowson, and a rent and other incorporeal hereditaments, and an easement, right, privilege, or any benefit in, over, or derived from land.”
Land is three-dimensional
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco: land includes lower airspace
Bernstein v Skyviews: lower airspace is that which is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of land.
Griffiths J “balance the rights of the owner to enjoy the use of his land against the rights of the general public to take advantage of all that science now offers in the use of air space”
Anchor Brewhouse Developments v. Berkley House
Scott J “If an adjoining owner places a structure on his (the adjoining owner's) land that overhangs his neighbour's land, he thereby takes into possession air space to which his neighbour is entitled. That, in my judgment, is trespass”.”
Wollerton and Wilson v. Richard Costain
Stamp J if trespass does not cause harm it will still be actionable – if an injunction is refused & nominal damages awarded then it only amounts to a licence to commit the tort for nominal consideration
Fixtures
What is the degree of annexation to the land; and
What is the purpose of annexation?
Berkley v. Poulet
Held: a statue was not regarded as part of the land because it was not fixed down in any way
Holland v. Hodgson
Held: (obiter) a pile of stones would not be a fixture, but the same pile of stones constructed as a dry-stone wall would be part of the land
Leigh v. Taylor
Held: tapestries attached to walls were regarded as chattels rather than fixtures
Elitestone v Morris
Held: (HL) a bungalow resting on foundation blocks on land was part of the land and not a chattel. Consequently, the occupation of the tenants in the bungalow was protected. Intention only relevant as to the extent of annexation
Lord Lloyd didn’t like the two-fold categorisation. Instead an object brought onto physical earth:
1. May remain a chattel;
2. May become part of the land itself; or
3. May be a fixture = a chattel which becomes part of the land but is removable
Compare: Chelsea Yacht & Boat Club Go Ltd Pope where a houseboat had not become part of the land but remained a chattel.
Note, however, that a tethered boat can amount to control of the river bed sufficient to make a claim in adverse possession – Port of London v Ashmore 2010
Treasure Act 1996 S.1 some items will revert to the Crown
Legal Interests
S.1 LPA 1925:
(2)The only interests or charges in or over land which are capable of subsisting or of being conveyed or created at law are—
(a)An easement, right, or privilege in or over land for an interest equivalent to an estate in fee simple absolute in possession or a term of years absolute
(b)A rentcharge in possession issuing out of or charged on land being either perpetual or for a term of years absolute
(c)A charge by way of legal mortgage;
(d) and any other similar charge on land which is not created by an instrument;
(e)Rights of entry exercisable over or in respect of a legal term of years absolute, or annexed, for any purpose, to a legal rentcharge.
(3)All other estates, interests, and charges in or over land take effect as equitable interests.
The formality used will also affect whether it is a legal or equitable right – must be...