Lombroso (1876): directly linked race with crime
Concluded that the coloured races and even “other” Whites (since the idea of race was centred around White northern Europe) shared many characteristics with “habitual delinquents”
After WW2, there was an attempt to separate racial ideology from social/physical sciences
Montagu (1943): race is a fallacy based on ideology
Increasing focus on ethnicity
Based on self-defined collectives rather than strictly biology
1960s Britain: anti-immigrant and racist
As a result of significant immigration from the former colonies
Major political parties were committed to reducing and stopping immigration
1970s: media images of “black criminality” led to entrenched views (Gilroy)
General population began to associate black people or ethnic minorities with violence and disorder
In 2001, 8% of the general population was made up of ethnic minorities
Because immigrants mostly settled where there were jobs which the indigenous community did not want, they are not evenly spread
Most are in deprived neighbourhoods and have educational under-achievement as well as higher unemployment
Heaven and Hudson (2005): absurd that ethnicity matters for crimes involving blacks and Asians but not when whites are the offenders
High profile racial killing in 1993
5 suspects arrested but not convicted
Accusations of corruption and race considerations in the investigation
2 suspects retried and sentenced in 2012
Public Inquiry commissioned by Home Secretary, carried out by Macpherson
Found evidence of institutional racism in the Metropolitan Police and other institutions
Found that the original investigation had been incompetent and corrupt, although the evidence was not as compelling as that showing racism
“Minority ethnic people remain over-surveilled and underprotected within all stages of our criminal justice system”
Black people more likely to be stopped and searched, listed in the DNA database and make up the prison population
Media portrays Black culture as being inherently criminogenic, resulting in racist stereotypes
Institutional Racism is not entirely eradicated
Trever Phillips (2009): Institutional racism no longer relevant to police practice
BUT some policies and practices still “systematically target and disadvantage ethnic minorities”, especially those that give officers discretion (Bowling)
E.g. stop and search, especially under CJPOA 1994 s60 (can stop and search without reasonable suspicion)
Minorities are also at a socio-economic disadvantage
Webster: Many studies fail to control for socio-demographic factors when making comparisons to guide practice and decisions
African Caribbean men more likely to be young offender prisoners than University undergraduates
Lack of attention to the problem
No clear government steering on the matter
Voluntary sector faces funding problems and cannot act
Prison
Runnymede Trust: Black people make up 15% of the prison population
MoJ (2009): 35% of male prisoners and 27% of female prisoners were from ethnic minorities
Increases in prison populations are greater for Black and Asian populations
Increases in prison population have been greater for black and Asian populations than white
Black: 6.8 incarcerated per 1000 nationals, White: 1.3 per 1000
Offending
According to self-report studies, White and Black patterns of offending are very similar
Webster: Self-reported statistics show that even where young White males reported higher drug use than young Black males, Whites were underrepresented for drugs offences while Blacks were “substantially overrepresented”
Victimisation
MoJ (2009): Black people 5 times as likely to get murdered, Asians 2 times as likely
NOTE (Bowling and Phillips, 2002): Most homicide is intra-ethnic
Stop and Search
Black: 7 times more likely
Asian: 2 times more likely
Webster: Might be related to class and geography, not just ethnicity
Black suspects less likely to admit offences because more likely to be arrested when innocent, or have less faith in CJS fairness
Phillips and Brown (1998): Black and Asian people were more likely than White people to be arrested and charged without sufficient evidence (more likely for CPS to terminate cases)
Heaven and Hudson (2005): Ethnicity tends to only be a consideration when dealing with BME offenders but not White offenders, which is absurd
Administrative categories used are NOT CONSISTENT
Categories in the CSEW are a mix of race, colour, nationality and geographic origin
Bowling and Phillips (2002): Categories fail to take into account “internal heterogeneity” of the groups
Types of ethnicity
Ascribed ethnicity: based on perceptions of another party
Might be affected by mutable characteristics (e.g. dressing)
Even immutable characteristics (physical appearance) can be misleading, especially for those of mixed origin
Relevant in provoking racial crimes and when victims identify offenders
Asserted ethnicity: based on self-identification
Relevant in determining whether they view themselves as victims of racially-motivated crimes
Other factors
Language: can affect communication with the local population
Ascribed: causes differential treatment of a non-local speaker
Nationality
Ascribed: immigration policy
Asserted: which community the person identifies with
Religion
Ascribed: social connotations (e.g. terrorists – Catholics or Muslims)
Asserted: influence of prescribed beliefs on personal identity
BCS Categorisation
Previously, respondents were ascribed a race (same as offenders)
White, Black, Asian, Chinese, Others
Now, “respondent-asserted” ethnicity is relevant instead (same categories as that used in the 2001 UK Census)
Wider range of categories (including sub-categories)
But doesn’t take into account language, immigration status and religion
ISSUE: categories are misleading
Mix of race, national origin and regional origin
Forces respondents to choose a specific category which may not be accurate
E.g. no pure Black-British
Subcategories are not consistent
Can only make comparisons within one general ethnic group
Official statistics show overrepresentation, but self-report statistics show similar offending rates between Whites and Blacks (and lower rates for Asians)
Racial discrimination?
Webster (2012): Black suspects less likely to admit offences because more likely to be arrested when innocent, or have less faith in CJS fairness
Black population is generally younger than White population (48% vs 31% below 24 years)
Young people more likely to offend?
Media over-sensationalising of certain crimes (e.g. mugging) creates stereotypes which affect reporting and arrests
Much higher stop and search likelihood for BME
Webster: Might be related to class and geography, not just ethnicity
Black suspects less likely to admit offences because more likely to be arrested when innocent, or have less faith in CJS fairness
Waddington (2004): Might be due to demographic factors (e.g. being at places or out at times where searches are carried out)
Hood (1992): Study of 5 Crown Courts in West Midlands found evidence of discrimination in sentencing
Black people 5% more likely to be sentenced to custody even after controlling for all legally relevant case characteristics
Black and Asian defendants received longer sentences in guilty plea cases
Phillips and Brown (1998): Black and Asian people were more likely than White people to be arrested and charged without sufficient evidence (more likely for CPS to terminate cases)
Formal Investigation by Commission for Racial Equality (2003): Evidence of direct racial discrimination in prisons
Failure to protect, meet religious/cultural needs and discriminatory allocation of jobs/privileges
Newburn (2004): Black people twice as likely to be strip-searched at police stations
Bowling and Phillips (2007): Even prominent Black people have been stopped without justification (suggesting racist targeting by the police)
NOMS Study (2008): Black prisoners 30% more likely to have no privileges and 60% more likely to have force used against them
Holdaway and Murji (2012): Government reduced the requirements for police officers to record information about people stopped/searched
This makes it much more difficult to monitor police discrimination
Minorities likely to fall within demographic categories where remand in custody more likely
E.g. “dangerous” neighbourhoods, lack of community ties
Housing inequalities: higher risk of absconding.
Phillips (1998): Minorities less likely to opt for legal advice or admit offences
Do not receive the benefits of cooperation
Even where legal advice is relied on, it may not be of the same quality
European Social Survey: Trust in fairness of the system plays a significant role in encouraging cooperation with authorities
Baker (2013): Minorities likely to lack knowledge/confidence about the local system
Williams (2006): BME offenders require specially arranged programmes in prison to be more effective at reducing reoffending
Dorling (2012): Jurors more likely to be White
Clancy (2001): Ethnic minorities less likely to think that the police acted politely and fairly...