Race and Criminal Justice
Institutional racism: “The collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantages minority ethnic people.” (Macpherson Report 1999 para 34, Stephen Lawrence Inquiry)
Bridges, “The Lawrence Inquiry – Incompetence, Corruption, and Institutional Racism” 1999
Macpherson report’s finding that “institutional racism… exists both in the MPS and in other Police Services and other institutions countrywide” (para 6.39)
Present in four specific areas:
In the actual investigation into the murder – failure of many officers to recognise the murder as a purely “racially motivated crime”
Countrywide in the disparity in “stop and search figures”
Countrywide in the significant under-reporting of “racial incidents” occasioned largely by lack of confidence in the police and their perceived unwillingness to take such incidents seriously
Identified failure of police training – not a single officer questioned in 1998 had received any training of significance in racism awareness in their career
But problems:
Echoed the earlier Scarman report that the MPS is not institutionally racist
No recommendations re stop and search powers
Provided virtually no details as to what elements of the wider CJS may constitute “institutional racism” or which criminal justice policies require to be examined
Clear that the government and police’s commitment to “anti-racism” is far from wholehearted or holistic
Always likely to be displaced by concerns to “tackle crime” and “speed up criminal justice” which have wider populist appeal
The Lammy Review 2017
BAME proportion in measures of youth offending have risen significantly:
BAME proportion of young people offending for the first time rose from 11% year ending March 2006 to 19% year ending March 2016
BAME proportion of young people reoffending rose from 11% 2006 to 19% 2016
BAME proportion of youth prisoners has risen from 25% to 41% in 2006-2016
Key principles: response to the disproportionate representation of BAME prisoners should be based around 3 core principles
Robust systems in place to ensure fair treatment in every part of the CJS
Bringing decision-making out into the open and exposing it to scrutiny is the best way of delivering fair treatment
Trust in the CJS is essential
Reason why so many BAME defendants plead not guilty, forgoing the opportunity to reduce sentences, is that they see the system in terms of “us and them”
CJS must have stronger analysis about where responsibility lies beyond its own boundaries
Crown Prosecution Service
Arrest rates are generally higher across minority ethnic groups in comparison to the white group
Black men were more than three times more likely to be arrested than White men
Policing affects how people view “the system” as a whole
Grievances over policing tactics, particularly the disproportionate use of Stop and Search, drain trust in the CJS in BAME communities
Police and the CPS must respond to gang crime in a proportionate way
Plea Decisions
BAME defendants are consistently more likely to plead not guilty than White defendants
Primary reason: lack of trust in the CJS among BAME communities
Makes BAME defendants less likely to cooperate with the police or trust the advice of legal aid solicitors, who can be seen as part of the “system”
Alongside building trust, CJS should learn from innovations that place less emphasis on the role of plea decisions
“Operation Turning Point” in the West Midlands intervened before Ds are asked to enter a plea
Ds given the opportunity to go through structured intervention instead of facing criminal charges
Compliance with the intervention saw charges dropped; non-compliance saw the D prosecuted
Courts
20% of cases involve BAME Ds each year
More subtle scrutiny is needed of sentencing decisions to ensure that many finely balanced judgements do not add up to disproportionate sentencing of BAME Ds over time
To build trust and respect for the rule of law, there must be a step change in the diversity of the magistracy, and especially the judiciary
Closer links must be built between courts and local communities to cut youth proven reoffending rates, which are higher for Black boys compared to their white counterparts
Prisons
BAME adults represent around 25% of the prison population
If demographics of the prison population reflected that of England and Wales, could have over 9000 fewer BAME people in prison
Youth custody population is smaller, but BAME proportion is much higher, at over 40%
There is evidence to suggest differential treatment against BAME offenders in both the adult and youth estates
BAME individuals are less likely to be identified with problems such as learning difficulties or mental health concerns on reception at prison
On average both BAME men and women in prison report poorer relationships with prison staff, including higher rates of victimisation by prison staff
Systems of redress need to be reviewed urgently
Just one in a hundred of prisoners alleging discrimination by staff having their case upheld, while there is inadequate governance surrounding key aspects of prison life, such as the Incentives and Earned Privileges system which BAME prisoners widely regard as unfair
Lack of diversity among prison officers helps to perpetuate a culture of “us and them” with BAME prisoners
Recommended steps:
More comprehensive approach to assessing prisoners’ health, education, and psychological state on entry to prisons
Creating more diverse workforce, including at leadership levels
Opening up more decision-making to outside scrutiny, including the way in which complaints about discrimination are handled
Holding prison leadership teams directly to account for the treatment and outcomes for BAME prisoners
Rehabilitation
Reoffending particularly high for young Black boys
Over half (51%) of 10-14 age group reoffending within a year, compared to 40% for White boys
Reforms to probation services introduced in 2014 were intended to produce more responsive probation services, delivered by specialist providers attuned to the needs of particular groups
But have not lived up to their billing
Small providers have found themselves squeezed out, while objective judgements from inspectorates, National Audit Office, and parliamentary select committees all suggest that rehabilitation had not been transformed
Lack of accountability for meeting the needs of those with protected characteristics, including BAME offenders
Equality duty too often produces only a superficial, tick-box approach
All Community Rehabilitation Companies should public detailed information about outcomes for different ethnic and religious groups
Youth system faces the biggest challenges on BAME reoffending, but has been slow to act
Since 2011, Youth Justice Board has been piloting BAME...