There are two main forms of businesses in the UK: page 4 | |
---|---|
Unincorporated | Incorporated |
No formal registration | Formal registration |
Treated as being the same as its owners | Legal entity with separate existence from its owners |
e.g. Sole trader and Partnership | e.g. Limited Liability P’ship, Public LC (PLC), Private LC (Ltd) page 10 |
Business | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Sole Trader | Very easy to form. Freedom to run as you like. All profits are the owner’s. | Unlimited liability for debts. Lacks ‘incorporated’ status. No day-to-day support |
Partnership Chap 1, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 | No formalities: very easy to form. Freedom to run as they like. Allows commercial secrecy. Tax-relief for start-up losses. All profits are the Partners’. | Unlimited liability for debts. Cumbersome decision making. Uncertainty w/out agreement. Cannot create a floating charge. Apparent authority will bind the firm. |
Limited Company | Limited liability for debts. Greater status. Potentially many investors. | Must register, formality, costs. More legal duties & liabilities. Information is public. Profits are company’s. |
Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) page 15 | Limited liability for debts. Freedom to run. Support of joint-decisions. | Must register. Information is public. Extra formality and costs. |
Decision-making |
|
---|---|
Apparent Authority |
|
Rights & Duties |
|
Partnership at Will |
|
Post-Dissolution |
|
Partnership Agreement
This essentially forms a binding contract between the Partners, the breach of which will permit a breach of contract claim. Under s.19, Partners may be able to alter an existing Agreement to facilitate a buy-out.
Issue | Position in PA 1890 | Include in the Agreement |
---|---|---|
Finance | All partners share equally in the capital profits and losses of the business (s.24(1)) |
|
Employment | All partners may partake in the management of the partnership, but there is no positive duty to do so (s.24(5)) |
|
Dissolution & Duration | Dissolved at any time by giving notice to the others (s.26) Death or bankruptcy will automatically dissolve the partnership (s.33) There is no provision for retirement of expulsion (s.25) Notice in writing is only required if the partnership was created by a deed (s.26) |
|
A 3rd Party Can Sue:
The contracting Partner under the doctrine of privity of contract
The firm as a whole if the Partner had actual or apparent authority (See Flowchart page 283)
This can include a Partner who joined post-debt if they entered into novation
A Partner who left the firm before the debt was incurred if:
As a result of ‘Holding Out’ (s.14(1))
The test set out in Nationwide v Lewis: where a creditor relied on a representation that a particular person was a Partner by oral (in conversation)/written (headed notepaper)/conduct (previous dealings) behaviour.
Failure to give Notice of Departure (s.36)
If the 3rd P has not received appropriate notice of a Partner’s retirement and then subsequently gives credit to the firm believing them to be a Partner, he may hold that Partner liable for the debts unless:
Actual notice was given (letter to all parties with whom the firm has contracted previously) – s.36(1)
Notice was placed in the London Gazette (irrespective of whether the 3rd P knew the publication existed or did not read it) – s.36(2)