Provided they have all been registered properly under s.860 CA:
Fixed charge or a mortgage takes priority over a floating charge over the same asset even if floating charge was created earlier than the fixed.
If more than one fixed charge over same asset, it is priority of creation date
If more than one floating charge over same asset, it is priority of creation date
If a validly registered “floating charge is granted over “N Co.’s” whole undertaking to secure all moneys outstanding to the “X Bank” at any time” and the same X Bank had a failed earlier fixed charge against N Co.’s property then, the posterior floating charge will secure any debts owed to X Bank from the earlier failed fixed charge. This is a trick that can be used by a Bank whose fixed charge has failed due to failure to register it properly. The new floating charge will be a rescue charge which will make recoverable what otherwise would be a failed fixed charge which would have rendered the Bank another unsecured creditor.
Registration |
|
---|---|
Late Registration |
|
No Registration |
|
It is a contractual promise not to give any more security over the asset without the creditor’s consent
It will be entered into Form MG01 when the charge is registered to ensure 3rd Ps have actual knowledge
If more security is given anyway: if the new fixed charge holder has actual knowledge of the negative pledge given to a floating charge holder, then he will lose his priority over them
Powers of Secured Creditors
Creditor wants to ensure they are in the best position to recover their money if Co. gets into financial difficulty and therefore they want to secure the debt against the debtor by charging the debtors property by means of:
The Creditor has a… | Can APPOINT |
---|---|
Fixed Charge s.236 A charge that attaches immediately to a fix asset belonging to Co. (premises, machinery) Created by deed. | LPA Receiver
|
Floating Charge s.236 A charge that attaches immediately to a group of assets belonging to Co. which may change from day to day (stock, debtors but usually the whole undertaking i.e. everything Co owns.) | Administrator
|
Floating Charge (created pre-15/09/03) | Administrative Receiver or Administrator
|
Powers of Unsecured Creditors
Petition for the company’s liquidation by either statutory demand or execution of judgment
Suggest a CVA
Apply to court to put the company into administration
Challenging Antecedent Transactions
Always do a timeline of the transaction!
To protect the public, a liquidator, creditor or secretary of State may apply to disqualify a director.
UNFIT TO RUN A COMPANY
Definitions | Trans. that puts creditor, surety or guarantor in better position on insolvency & Co. desired this | Any creation of a floating charge where there was no fresh consideration “Old Debt" | A Co. transfers asset for no consideration or less than value of asset. |
---|---|---|---|
Step | Preferences s.239 | Avoidance of Floating Charge s.245 | Transaction at Undervalue s.238 |
Is Company insolvent? | When the Transaction was entered into Co. must have been insolvent at the time or become insolvent as a result (IA s.240(s)). This is presumed for a connected person (IA s.249 and s.435(10)) see below. | ||
Is it a suspicious transaction? | Either no consideration was given or a creditor has been put in a better position | ||
Who can challenge it? | Liquidator or Administrator with the court’s consent (s.239(1) and (2)) | None required because the charge is automatically void | Liquidator or Administrator with the court’s consent (s.238(1) and (2)) |
When can it be challenged? | After the company has become insolvent | ||
Is it within the definition? |
|
|
|
Is it within the relevant time? s.240 Relevant time = time when the creditor presented his petition for winding up the Co. | There is a Connected Person Transactions two years before the onset of insolvency (s.240(1)(a)) No Connected Person Transactions six months before the onset of insolvency (s.240(1)(b)) | There is a Connected Person Transactions two years before the onset of insolvency (s.240(1)(a)) No Connected Person Transactions twelve months before the onset of insolvency (s.240(3)(b)) | There is a Connected Person Transactions two years before the onset of insolvency (s.240(1)(c)) No Connected Person Transactions six months before the onset of insolvency (s.240(1)(d)) |
Is it with a connected person? s.249 & s.435 |
| ||
Effect of the connected person? | Rebuttable presumption that there was a desire to prefer | Rebuttable presumption that the Company was insolvent at the time of the transaction or became insolvent because of it | |
Defence | None | None | Made in good faith to benefit the Co. for the purpose of carrying on the business(based on reasonable grounds)s238(5) |
Court orders | The transaction is voidable (s.241(1)) and the court can either (a) return the proceeds to the company or (b) return the property to the company or order a discharge of a security |
EXTORIONATE CREDIT TRANSACTION (s.244 IA) – very difficult to prove that it was grossly extortionate
Step | Wrongful Trading (s.214 IA) | Fraudulent Trading (s.213 IA & s.993 CA) | Misfeasance (s.212 IA) |
---|---|---|---|
Who can apply? | Liquidator with court’s consent | Civil: Liquidator with consent Criminal: the CPS | Official Receiver, Liquidator, Creditor or Contributory |
When can it be challenged? | After liquidation has begun | Civil: after liquidation begun Criminal: any time | After liquidation has begun |
Who is the claim brought against? | Directors and former directors, shadow Ds or anyone participating in management decisions. | Anyone knowingly carrying on a business with the intention to defraud | Officer, old liquidator, administrative receiver (i.e. anyone managing it) |
What must be shown | s.214(2) on B.o.P (a) company is insolvent (b) before liquidation, person knew or ought to have known that they were going into liq (c) he was a D at the time | The person took the actions with the intention to defraud creditors (very difficult to show) | Breach of trust or fiduciary duty to the company (s.212(2)) |
Defence | s.214(3): D took all the reasonable steps to minimise the loss and was reasonable prospect of liquidation (took professional advice & kept full minutes, etc. see note WS 1) | Rebut allegation of... |