Eligibility
burden of proof on employee
3 months (-1 day) from day of termination (EDT)
2 years of service for those employed on/after 6th April 2012; 1 year for others
not in an excluded class
Dismissal
burden of proof on employee
non-renewal of fixed-term contract after expiry
actual dismissal
constructive dismissal
Reason for Dismissal (ERA 1996, s98 (2))
burden of proof on employer
what is the reason
is it one of the 5 potentially fair reasons
Fairness of Dismissal (ERA 1996, s98 (4))
test – range of reasonable responses
employer size and resources
equity
sufficiency of reason employer has given
substantial merits
procedure
ACAS code of conduct
Remedies
reinstatement / reengagement (re-hired either in same position or company)
compensation
basic: age factor (/1/1) x gross weekly pay (max 464 from 6th April 2014) x number of complete years in service (max 20) – (EA 2002, s38)
compensatory: immediate loss of net earnings, future losses incl. pension, mitigation, other deductions (max 76,574 from 6th April 2014)
basic/compensatory award can be increased or decreased by up to 25% for unreasonable failure to follow ACAS Code
Other Claims
consider redundancy payment, wrongful dismissal, discrimination
but employee cannot be compensated twice for the same loss
STATE THE CLAIM BEING MADE – Unfair Dismissal
Every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed by his employer (s 94 ERA 1996)
CLAIM & LIMITATION | The claim must be made within 3 months of the Effective Date of Termination EDT) (s.111)- or within such time as the Tribunal considers reasonably practicable for the complaint to be presented. This may be extended;
Simon Boyle has complied for the time limit requirement. |
---|---|
Eligibility test |
|
MUST BE AN EMPLOYEE |
|
WHO HAS THE REQUISITE PERIOD OF EMPLOYMENT |
NB if the employee is dismissed without notice but given wages in lieu, the EDT is still the date the employee was told to go. NB2 With a constructive dismissal, the EDT is the date of departure-which is then to be the employee’s acceptance of the repudiation/fundamental breach.
|
EXCLUDED CLASSES |
|
PRECEDENT |
|
WHO HAS BEEN DISMISSED | [Claimant] has to prove the dismissal. Under s.95(1) ERA 1996 which covers;
On the facts, [EMPLOYEE] was [DIMISSAL] therefore he has been actually dismissed without notice (s.95(1)).
‘On the facts, [EMPLOYER] has… (check any clauses for guidance on whether it could be argued that the reason is ok)
This is a repudiatory (not minor) breach of [express or implied] terms of the contract which will entitle [EMPLOYEE] to resign (without or without notice) and discharge the contract for constructive dismissal (Western Excavating). [EMPLOYEE] has a good chance despite it being difficult to prove. [EMPLOYEE] [DID/MUST] resign within a reasonable time of the breach [DATE EXAMPLE].
NB not resignation/mutual agreement/having their contract frustrated. |
---|---|
ACAS procedure | Where an employee intends to rely on s 95(1)(c) of the ERA 1996 – constructive dismissal – • Let the employer know the nature of the grievance. • Hold a meeting with the employee to discuss the grievance. • Allow the employee to be accompanied at the meeting. • Decide on appropriate action. • Allow the employee to take the grievance further if not resolved. • Overlapping grievance and disciplinary cases: where an employee raises a grievance during a disciplinary process, the disciplinary process may be suspended temporarily in order to deal with the grievance. Where the grievance and disciplinary cases are related, it may be appropriate to deal with both issues concurrently. |
‘The burden of proof is on [EMPLOYER] to show that the reason for the dismissal was fair…’
An employer may be justified in dismissing an employee for the substantive reason, but the dismissal may still be unfair if there are procedural defects.
Under s 98(2)[ ], an employer may dismiss an employee for reasons that relate to [state the reason].
The five permitted reasons under s 98(2) ERA 1996 must relate to:
the employee’s capability or qualifications to do the work they were employed to do;
the employee’s conduct;
the fact that the employee is redundant;
the fact that the employee could...