The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF
sample above, taken from our
BPC Civil Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have
odd formatting.
The overriding objective of the CPR is to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at a proportionate cost.
Parties are required to help the court to further the overriding objective.
The court must further the overriding objective by actively managing cases: encouraging cooperation, discouraging unreasonable conduct, using costs as an incentive, and encouraging ADR.
This applies to all litigants.
It aims to ensure the equality of arms, and an appellate or reviewing court will set aside a decision affected by bias.
Considering ADR
Courts should provide support for the use of ADR through case management and sanctions. But it is not compulsory.
Benefits of ADR:
Lower costs
Speed of settlement
Choice of forum
Control of process
Flexibility of process
Confidentiality
Wider range of outcomes may be considered
Shared future interests may be protected
Use of a problem-solving approach
Risk management
When considering ADR, to choose the most appropriate form think about:
How important is it to minimise costs?
How important is fast resolution?
How much control does the party want?
Would the view of an expert be important to key issues?
Would neutral assistance be valuable?
What are the main objectives of the party?
Is the future relationship important?
If there is likely to be an ongoing relationship between the parties, non-adjudicative ADR is best.
ADR may not be appropriate where:
There is need for precedent
The importance of a court order
The relevance of interim orders
Evidential rules are importance
Time limits for starting proceedings
Legitimate concern that the other side would commence proceedings in another jurisdiction
The complexity of the case
High levels of animosity
Power imbalance
Quasi-criminal allegations
Having a day in court
Enforcement may be an issue
Telling the other party would defeat the purpose (e.g freezing order)
The strength of the case
Role of Lawyer in ADR
Furthering the overriding objective includes considering ADR
Main elements of the role of the lawyer:
Ensuring that the client is aware of ADR
Providing information relevant to ADR options
Advising on pre-action obligations
Advising on overriding objective
Ensuring client is aware of penalties
Give appropriate advice on funding and costs
Getting clear instruction on the form of ADR
Objective reasons for not selecting ADR
Assisting in selecting independent third parties
Advising on strengths and weaknesses of case
Considering and advising offers
Advising on and drafting terms of settlement
The lawyer should only reach a final agreement if so authorised by the client
Halsey
The court cannot compel parties to use ADR
Unreasonable refusal to consider = court has the power to deprive the winning party of some or all their costs
Silence in the face of ADR is unreasonable
But it can direct the parties to consider ADR at a case management conference or pre-trial review.
Parties can choose to stay for one month to try to settle or say why they cannot do this. If a stay is granted, the parties must keep the court informed.
If a party believes they have reasonable grounds for refusing to engage with ADR they must respond to the offer promptly, in writing, giving full reasons.
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.
We offer free case summaries, sample notes, and award-winning content, all curated and approved by our editorial team. Our reputation for excellence has led to features in The Guardian, Wikipedia, and the National Council for Law Reporting (Kenya Law).
Every year, millions of students utilize our free and premium notes to aid their studies.